Media Matters summarizes what you’ve always more or less suspected:
During the February 10 edition of Fox News’ Happening Now, co-host Jon Scott claimed that “the Senate is expected to pass the $838 billion stimulus plan — its version of it, anyway. We thought we’d take a look back at the bill, how it was born, and how it grew, and grew, and grew.” In tracking how and when the bill purportedly “grew,” Scott referenced seven dates, as on-screen graphics cited various news sources from those time periods. However, all of the sources and cost figures Scott cited, as well as the accompanying on-screen text, were also contained in a February 10 press release issued by the Senate Republican Communications Center. One on-screen graphic during the segment even repeated a typo from the GOP document, further confirming that Scott was simply reading from a Republican press release. The Fox News graphic and the GOP press release both claimed that a Wall Street Journal report that the stimulus package could reach “$775 billion over two years” was published on December 19, 2009 [emphasis added].
And before you start, yes, we quote press releases too: the difference is we’re nice enough to tell you that’s what we’re doing.
H/T: Progress Now
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: scarter
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s A Weekend Town Hall-Palooza Featuring Absent Gabe Evans
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: Uber Bullies Lawmakers To Protect Bad Drivers
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
You act as if this dude is some influential player. This ain’t Jim Leher, its FOX.
Now that your head has exploded and nothing really happened you should return your terminal to Google and research the ‘fairness doctrine’.
I’d suggest your Spring ’09 project is to establish a peoples movement to stand up to that other myth … the evil Rush.
Not so much, Libertine! More like a propaganda reader.
You don’t find it the least bit embarrassing that this guy was caught reciting a GOP press release–right down to the typos?
Best case for the Fairness Doctrine (the uncontroversial law of the land from 1949 until Rush Limbaugh) I’ve seen in years.
That thin skinned bastard can’t hold his own as he parades across other news programs to gurgle his warped positions.
The difference here is this Scott guy doesn’t go out on mouthpiece missions.
Schultzie here, he rolls Chicago-style, he gets a seat front and center seat at the President’s PC as if it will morph him into a “real” policy reporter.
Fox is propaganda pure and simple. It doesn’t just lean. It isn’t just biased. It is a mouthpiece organization that bears no resemblance to a legitimate news network.
Murdoch himself has freely admitted that the purpose is to promote his conservative agenda. If he doesn’t pretend it’s a legitimate news network or that it even attempts to do objective journalism, I’ll take his word for it.
And my head isn’t exploding. The success of Dems in taking over the White House, congress, state legislatures and Governor’s mansions all speaks to Fox’s waning influence. As their demo ages, Fox is more bark than increasingly toothless bite.
APPEALS COURT REVERSES JURY IN AKRE V FOX TV CASE
Accepting a defense rejected by three other Florida state judges on at least six separate motions, a Florida appeals court has reversed the $425,000 jury verdict in favor of journalist Jane Akre who charged she was pressured by Fox Television management and lawyers to air what she knew and documented to be false information.
“In a six-page written decision released February 14, the court essentially ruled the journalist never stated a valid whistle- blower claim because, they ruled, it is technically not against any law, rule, or regulation to deliberately lie or distort the news on a television broadcast.
“In the lawsuit filed in 1998, Akre claimed she was wrongfully terminated for threatening to blow the whistle to the FCC. After a five-week trial that ended August 18, 2000, a six-person jury was unanimous in its conclusion that she was indeed fired for threatening report the station’s pressure to broadcast what jurors decided was “a false, distorted, or slanted” story about the widespread use of growth hormone in dairy cows.
“In overturning the jury on what amounts to a legal technicality, the court did not dispute the heart of Akre’s claim, that Fox pressured her to broadcast a false story to protect the broadcaster from having to defend the truth in court, as well as suffer the ire of irate advertisers.”
And again, if you believe that this is manufactured, here’s the actual court documents
http://www.2dca.org/opinion/February%2014,%202003/2D01-529.pdf
http://www.2dca.org/opinion/February%2025,%202004/2D01-529.pdf
that Fox News, a creature born of the right-wing myth of a prevalent liberal bias in the mainstream news media, counterbalances that alledged bias by engaging in sub-standard journalistic practices, once again proving that the American Right and Islamic Fundamentalists are twin children of different mothers.
when people — Democrat and Republican alike — cared about journalistic standards. Sadly, those days appear to be gone. That is the point of this post — calling a news anchor at Fox a “news reader” doesn’t get them off the hook. If Fox markets itself as a legitimate news organization — a “fair and balanced” one no less — then they should not be reading GOP press releases verbatim, period. Stop pretending like this is no big deal.
Times are tough over at News Corp.
Why bother with expensive journalists when your friends in DC will send you this stuff to read for FREE!
if the Falafel Guy will discuss his own sexual proclivities when he showcases Laura Bradford’s sex crimes bill on his show tonight. Or how Bradford expects to pay for her increased expenditures.
Oh, wait, Laura Bradford’s apt plot to abort state budget woes is…:release prisoners who have served their time. As Political Notebook reports:
Why did we not elect this genius earlier? How dare prisons not release criminals after they served their sentence. How many prisoners are kept in prison after serving their sentences and how much will it save the state if we release them, Ms. Bradford? Of course, if criminals are dumb enough not to know when their time is up, maybe they should stay put?
But creating programs costs money too.
Memo to Bradford: the state has no money for extras this year.