Bush’s former speech writer exposes the partisan purge of the guy who has made America’s African AIDS program such a success.
Talk about partisan. Obama can’t stand to continue the program that is considered one of Bush’s greatest contributions.
By encouraging Dybul to stay until his successor was in place, the Obama administration displayed a generous spirit, as well as a practical concern for continuity in a vital program.
Then, the day after the inauguration, Dybul received a call asking him to submit his resignation and to leave by the end of the day. There was no chance to reassure demoralized staffers, or PEPFAR teams abroad, or the confused health ministers of other nations. The only people who seemed pleased were a few blogging extremists, one declaring, “Dybul Out: Thank you, Hillary!!!”
As in most political hit-and-run attacks, the perpetrator was not anxious to take credit. It seems unlikely to be Hillary Clinton herself — Dybul’s ultimate boss at the State Department — who had not even been confirmed when Dybul received his call. But someone at State or the White House determined that sacrificing Dybul would appease a few vocal, liberal interest groups. One high-ranking Obama official admitted that the decision was “political.” Yet the AIDS coordinator is not a typical political job, distributed as spoils, like some deputy assistant position at the Commerce Department. It involves directing a massive emergency operation to provide lifesaving drugs, through complex logistics, to some of the most distant places on Earth. And now that operation may be months without effective leadership — undermining morale, complicating interagency cooperation, delaying new prevention initiatives and postponing budget decisions.
It is difficult to imagine what vision of public service could cause any Obama official to celebrate a victory by sabotaging a good man and a good cause. And it is difficult to conceive what political gain Obama has achieved. This type of captivity to extreme interests is precisely what has discredited Democrats so often in the past. It is a kind of politics with all the “newness” of a purge, all the “freshness” of a mugging.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Air Slash
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Air Slash
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Air Slash
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Air Slash
IN: Hurd Takes Action To Protect Medicaid While Gabe Evans’ Excuse-a-Thon Goes On
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: The Triumph And The Trouble With Yadira Caraveo
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Boebert Either Doesn’t Understand Voter Registration or Lied About It on the House Floor
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Soon after I got my first Zenith 90 (CPM OS) computer in the early 80s, I signed on to CompuServe and discovered a thread started by a young man dying from AIDS.
He kept us updated on his illness and progress, and a couple of docs chimed in with comments.
It was very sad.
The Rick Warren and Bush HIV/AIDS plan in Africa is a failure. It was conceived from the “abstinence only” view. Condoms were forbidden, as was family planning.
Just because someone is gay does not mean he or she is working for the betterment of humanity.
From The Age :
The Rolling Stone:
About what I expected.
Bush bashing despite Obama’s deplorable decision.
that you can use ‘intellectual integrity’ in the same sentence.
Who did Bush replace in this position when he made his POLITICAL APPOINTMENTS?
Amazing?
No.
Typically unthinking.
that you won’t answer a simple question?
What evidence do you have that this was ‘Obama’s move’?
Sorry, that’s two questions I know. Don’t want your head to implode (what things do when the vacuous internal space gets to over-bearing).
if not his decision. Whoever made the decision to ask for Dr. Dybul’s resignation, they, or their boss on up the line, work for the President. He is where the buck stops, right?
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/in…
You may not like the former President, but don’t let that blind you to the facts. The U.S. plan to combat AIDS in Africa has been anything but a failure.
From the PlusNews site: http://www.plusnews.org/Report…
“Several 100,000 people in South Africa are alive, thanks to the PEPFAR programme,” said Dr Francois Venter, president of the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society. “They’ve patched up gaps in provision to groups like illegal immigrants and refugees. I think there’s fairly universal acknowledgement it’s been a successful programme.”
What is really interesting is that the Obama administration wanted to leave Dr. Dybul to stay on until his replacement was confirmed. But outside organizations apparently worked to have him removed immediately, leaving PEPFAR leaderless.
I can’t see how this situation helps AIDS victims in Africa, but politics apparently supersedes human life in the Obama administration.
And who did Bush replace in this program when HE came into office and made his POLITICAL APPOINTMENTS… Just wondering as I suspect there is more to this than AS is bothering to consider, not that that is any surprise. Here is one from the 20 pages of comments attached to this OPINION PIECE that I found worthy to share:
Here’s an actual link to a news story, not some idiot speechwriter.
“Don’t have sex, and you won’t get AIDS.” That’s a brilliant plan.
He didn’t buy into Bush’s abstinence only idiocy. Read the column.
Whether he personally bought into it or not, he went along with a bad policy.
And your statements about supporting gay marriage or letting people die of AIDS are hateful lying bullshit.
Gerson talked to the White House and got confirmation that this was a political purge.
Read the column.
in a political appointment. Kind of like firing merit employees because they aren’t right-wing enough. Oh wait,no it’s not.
Here, let me put it in a block for you AS:
See my question is open ended, you can answer it thoughtfully should you want to or be able. The question I hear you asking is this, if I may paraphrase:
Can’t use reliable evidence because he looks for things that fit his worldview rather than what is really true.
I’ll give you credit when you can find NEWS sources. For the millionth time, an unsourced editorial from a partisan is not news, therefore it is not a legitimate source to support your case.
This is why you have no credibility.
But an Asia Times article says of Dybul’s predecessor…
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/F…