U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Michael Bennet
(D) Phil Weiser
60%↑
50%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) David Seligman
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) J. Danielson
(R) Sheri Davis
50%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(D) Jeff Bridges
(R) Kevin Grantham
40%
40%
30%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Trisha Calvarese
(D) Eileen Laubacher
90%
20%
20%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Shannon Bird
45%↓
40%
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
January 25, 2009 05:28 PM UTC
8 Comments
The
posted PRIVATE PARTY NO TRESPASSING (Help please use back entrance)
at the national convention.
Yeah, big if you are white and preferably male.
What a crock of shit, these R’s and their claims of a big tent. “Oh yes, why we have at least ten house ne…. I mean African-Americans who vote Republican.”
it includes everyone who wants to keep government out of individual decisions that affect the public welfare, but deeply involved in personal choices that are no one else’s business but the people who make them.
Republican government is the elephant in the room: It pretends it’s purpose is not to be there, but all of that stomping and trumpeting is hard to ignore.
How can so many clowns keep coming out of such a miniature car?!
Speck on the windshield, Bob. Get your terms right.
He meant log in the eye.
If “small government” is one of the principles Mr. Beauprez wants to return to, does he mean he still supports the roll back of Ref. “C” like he did in 2006 which if it had happened would have meant:
1.Ten of Colorado’s thirteen community colleges would have to close;
2. Tuition at our colleges and universities would rise to the same level as private universities like Stanford, Harvard and Notre Dame within four or five years making it impossible and unaffordable for most of our children to go to college; and
3. The budget for CDOT would shrivel to nothing. Our infrastructure would deteriorate even more.
In other words, does he still favor the dismantling of our government.
Specifically, at this time, what role does he believe government should have and how much money should be budgeted for each function. Once he answers those questions, we’ll know if he has returned to traditional Republican values which, in the past, meant preserving the American way of life, not destroying it based on some newly hatched ideological reason(s).
Is that possible?
A contradiction in terms?
Referring to deep piles of horse manure?