As the Greeley Tribune reports:
The Weld District Attorney’s Office said newly elected Weld County Commissioner Barbara Kirkmeyer likely broke a state law when she helped the towns of Firestone, Gilcrest and Fort Lupton earn state grants from 2007-2008, but there is no penalty to pursue in this case.
Weld District Attorney Ken Buck has surmised that given that knowledge, the towns’ grants could be suspended if the new director decides the grants were wrongfully approved…
Kirkmeyer served as the executive director of the state department [of Local Affairs] from January to August 2006, and she worked in other capacities there until June 30, 2007.
State law prohibits former employees, within six months of such employment, “from contracting with the state agency or any local governments involving matters with which he was directly involved during is his employment.”
Kirkmeyer entered into a number of contracts with cities and towns for grant-writing services, as soon as four months after leaving the department. In all, she earned $35,500 for her services with the three towns.
Officials with the state department confirmed Friday they had received Buck’s letter and affidavit, which stated that there is no evidence Kirkmeyer was aware of the law’s provisions before entering into the contracts with the towns.
Got that? The Bill Owens-appointed head of the Department of Local Affairs is claiming ignorance of the most important ethics law governing her as a recent state employee. Which works out really well, because the ethics law in question requires that you “knowingly” violate it for there to be a penalty. Voila!
“I think it’s just confusing,” she said. “It’s hard to have a lapse in judgment when you don’t know about something.”
Molocznik reported that he reviewed the Department of Personnel Director’s Administrative Procedures that were in effect while Kirkmeyer worked with the department, and that he could not find any reference to the state law in question.
“I didn’t know it was an issue,” Kirkmeyer said.
The Owens handbook omitted the “revolving door” section? Come on, act “surprised,” just like Kirkmeyer was “surprised.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Colorado Challenges Trump’s (First) Unconstitutional Penstroke
BY: Genghis
IN: Lauren Boebert, Rocket Surgeon
BY: Ajm Khan
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: allyncooper
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Colorado Challenges Trump’s (First) Unconstitutional Penstroke
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Have each departing state or local employee SIGN a simple acknowledgement: “I understand that under the ethics law I cannot contract with my state agency (etc. etc.) for six months.”
If he’d signed such a statement, that would be Exhibit A of “knowing” misconduct.
But it’ll never happen, because the state doesn’t like the ethics law and doesn’t want anyone to get caught for violating it.
Do we even have an Ethics Board appointed yet? Have they investigated a SINGLE complaint yet?
and they have offered an opinion on the scholarship issue raised. I don’t think any complaints have been filed yet.
rather than meaning that the person knew that the contracts were unlawful to enter into.
I suspect the DA’s point is that a violation of a state ethics rule may not be a crime.
can I keep the money too?