U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 05, 2008 05:30 AM UTC

Ballot Initiatives Open Thread

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Here they come.

Comments

12 thoughts on “Ballot Initiatives Open Thread

  1. 46: Close but presently losing by 3% – this is a very nice surprise, I hope it can hold.

    47: Down 10% so it’s almost certainly dead. And if it stays this large, is a resounding F.U. to Jonathan Coors.

    48: Could this be the worst showing ever for an initiative? A very clear message from ¾ of the state – they do not want all abortion outlawed.

    49: Another leave the unions alone message and an even more resounding F.U. to Job Caldera. Will this guy have any political mojo after this?

    50: This looks like it will pass.

    51: I thought for sure this would pass, but it is down 20% and so it almost certainly is a no.

    52: Giant no on this. Takes a lot of the wind out of the sails of Penry, Brody, etc.

    54: Oh, oh – this is the one business really wanted shot down and it’s winning by a bit. Interesting how this all played out. And if this is the one conservative one to pass, puts Lucero in a strong position.

    58 & 59: They are losing by almost identical margins. But close enough that there is still a prayer. What’s interesting is if they stay identical, it means the oil companies with their 10 million campaign had zero impact – weird.

    1. where it is passing big time but where most of the vote isn’t counted yet.  54 is something of a puzzle but probably can be challenge in court on 14th amendment grounds. Cud be a long night on the amendment count.

    2. will we ever hear the end of it from Libertad?

      I guess two out of three ain’t bad though.

      Looks like we both got disappointed on 58 and 59 Dave. That does not bode well for the Guv and Speaker Romanoff (though 58 going down hurts Ritter more than 59 going down hurts Romanoff.)

      1. Romanoff & Kennedy put in an extraordinary effort, did everything right, and had no real opposition.

        On 58 the governor had Obama as his first priority (as he should), they had less resources from what I could see, and they had a 10 million opposition that did a very good job.

        And both were to fund education.

        How can they get equal votes?

        1. As Bob pointed out the votes from Denver aren’t in yet which could swing the vote on 59.  Don’t know if I’d agree though that they “did everything right” or had “no real opposition”.  I’m registered unaffiliated, got two calls from people opposing 59 and a mailer but got nothing from the pro-59 people in mail or phone.  I did see a few pro-59 t.v. ads but they were long after I sent my ballot in and got lost among all the Vote No ads.  My favorite is the one-sided yard signs for 59!

          58 definitely hits Ritter’s standing but then he seems to be doing everything possible to hurt his chances of re-election. I do think 58 had an uphill battle in this economic environment and most people just read the word TAX and say no thanks

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

143 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!