U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 04, 2008 09:38 AM UTC

Report clears Palin in Troopergate probe

  • 6 Comments
  • by: NEWSMAN

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) – A report has cleared Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin of ethics violations in the firing of her public safety commissioner.

Released Monday, the report says there is no probable cause to believe Palin or any other state official violated the Alaska Executive Ethics Act in connection with the firing. The report was prepared by Timothy Petumenos, an independent counsel for the Alaska Personnel Board.

http://www.breitbart.com/artic…

Comments

6 thoughts on “Report clears Palin in Troopergate probe

    1. She had the right to have who she wanted in that position, just as Obama has the right to have who he wants at Secretary of Defence, State, or Commerce.

      I don’t care why she fired the guy.

      1. Interesting to think she has a “right” to choose who gets to investigate her.

        A more apt comparison is the President choosing a special prosecutor to investigate his own alleged misgivings. Since that’s a high spotlight position it usually will be someone who won’t be inclined to whitewash the matter.

        1. The person she fired was not elected, he was appointed by the governor.  She can fire him anytime she wishes, just like a president can fire a political appointee.  

          He was not fired for investigating her.  She was investigated for firing him.

          1. State employees in Alaska are at-will? That would make your statement true.

            But maybe I misunderstood your original post. It certainly didn’t answer my questions, which were, Was the panel fair and impartial in your opinion? And, what do you make of the timing (which was the day before Election Day)?

            FWIW, I kinda doubt that she did anything wrong, but I’m not familiar with the case. All I know is that people have said she hand-picked the panel that investigated her, and if so it sure makes the clearance suspect.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

141 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!