U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) George Stern
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
November 04, 2008 04:03 AM UTC
3 Comments
Who could oppose clean government?
Ewegen the offshorer of American jobs, Union Bosses, Corporate Thugs and the Political Bosses that bind them all together.
YES on 54, proletariat was screwed when Union Bosses (to lazy to defend their position), propose then accept a financial pay-off by certain corporate thugs to take righteous measures from the vote of the people because they were too lazy to fight them.
Vote YES on 47 and 54 to free the proletariat of the thuggery.
are you saying that the union proposed amendments like demanding all businesses with 20+ employees provide health care coverage to their employees were righteous? That hardly seems like your normal positions on these issues.
The “proletariat”? Isn’t that Socialist Obama type speech? I hardly think you would want to go there.
And what does 54 have to do with corporations agreeing with labor to keep the peace and the status quo (which, by the way, is working relatively well)? It has to do with government contractors or unions that have government contracts not giving political donations.
If 54 was already law, labor and business would have still agreed to holster their weapons and joined forces against the meddling, regulatory, and unnecessary 47. So I fail to see how passing it now would be payback for the labor/business agreement, much less how it would prevent such agreements in the future.
And there are still the Constitutionality questions with 54. I can see the point about 54 attempting to remove impropriety from government contracts, but I am not sure it successfully does that, and risks junking up the state Constitution with policies that really ought to be implemented legislatively.
Vercy, maybe it is time to call Joe Blake, Ritchie, Isenberg and Hammil. They’ll walk you through the deal. If you don’t have access there, I’d suggest a call to Jess Knox, Ernie Duran, or Mitch Ackerman. They’ll help you justify your position and get the talking points down too.
You are full of thuggery.