U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 28, 2008 08:08 PM UTC

Are We Understood?

  • 0 Comments
  • by: Sarah from No On 48

Are we understood about what the nightmare scenarios of Amendment 48 passing would be?

The following is one of my favorite commercials for No on 48. Earlier the ACLU did a commercial for us, we have various others support the fight against 48 but this one I like because it shows what exactly the outcome of 48 would be and how this amendment is destructive in very common situations.

Jen needed a common procedure to cure a common situation. She had a tubal pregnancy that could kill her and would definitely harm the pregnancy. If Amendment 48 were law in Colorado, this common procedure would have complicated things and her surgery would have been delayed. Imagine getting pregnant in literally the wrong place, at the wrong time and having your life endangered because of it. All you need is a common procedure so you can move on with your life but no, your doctor has to fill out a report, get a second opinion to ensure that there is no possibility of viability, there has to be more paperwork, maybe insurance won’t cover it anymore because we know that’s how insurance companies work, etc etc. This scenario can go on and on. It’s totally realistic to indulge in speculation about logical and probable outcomes of a sneaky Amendment to the Colorado Constitution.  

Ectopic pregnancy is not a situation where the details are always the same. Efforts to legislate it post 48 would be impossible and irregular.

There is just no way (nor any reason) to legislate against women’s health care when the factors in each situation are totally different and unpredictable from the next. Vote NO on 48 because it really does just go too far.  

Comments

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

88 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!