U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 23, 2008 02:00 AM UTC

Amendment 54 - Clean Government?

  • 0 Comments
  • by: Libertad

Why is the unholy alliance of Union Bosses, the Denver Chamber of Commerce and Governor Ritter so opposed to Clean Government?

When you see Unions, Politicians and Corrupt Businessmen united in an unholy alliance … all citizen’s need to ask why.

But wait there must be something to this effort.

Publicly elected CU regent Tom Lucero is chairing this Amendment 54. He is in government, oversees a $40 billion institution, yet he stands up for all Coloradans.

It seems to me that his voice will be heard.

“YES on 54 is just good common sense: having a searchable database is the perfect disinfectant for corrupt NO-BID contracts. A searchable database will put elected officials on notice that every time a NO-BID contract goes out the door, taxpayers will be watching. Ultimately, the goal is for every government contract to be competitively bid. YES on 54 makes taxpayers the real winners.” – Tom Lucero CU Regent

However, according to the DMCC their opposition is:

The proposal has First Amendment ramifications by politically silencing businesses that have a solesource contract with a public entity. Additionally, the nonprofit sector is adversely affected as they may have sole-source contracts, such as the provisions for health care and social services. Rural Colorado is also impacted, as in some of our state’s smaller communities there are limited numbers of businesses that are able/equipped to bid on public contracts, making a solesource award more common.

So they admit they are sole source inside dealing profiteers and oppose cleaning up their scam. I can clearly see why they are opposing this, it is against their economic interests.

Why is the Denver Chamber-EDC opposed to Clean Government

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

67 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!