U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 21, 2008 06:57 AM UTC

MediaNews Boss plans to profit : Offshoring journalism's future

  • 3 Comments
  • by: Libertad

After deciding to bailout on real worker rights (Amendment 47) and enjoining the inside dealing Denver Chamber crowd (Amendment 54), MediaNews CEO and AP Chairman is promoting nearly complete offshoring of thousands of American jobs.

Obviously hooking up with the ballot pay-off coalition has given this Boss some creative strategies to maximize his profits.

The Union downside is less jobs. The Union Bosses got a $1-3 million pay-off, but they’ll be seeing even less jobs to give to their nephews and sons.

“In today’s world, whether your desk is down the hall or around the world, from a computer standpoint, it doesn’t matter,” Singleton said after his speech.

MediaNews having combined many operations near San Francisco, now thinks sending those and other positions overseas maybe just what it needs to maximize EPS in the new economy.

“One thing we’re exploring is having one news desk for all of our newspapers in MediaNews … maybe even offshore,”

http://www.usatoday.com/money/…

“We used to have on-the-ground reporters, but the expense was prohibitive,” said one editor/publisher. “Regretfully, we had to lay them all off.”

Although they’ll miss the local nuance, the cost savings will come through the regurgitation of PR emails from corporate PR goons.

“You might miss the nuance of a sneer on a councilman’s face but you know how he voted and what he said,” he said. “That’s factual and can be reported on from anywhere.”

Editors and reporters have intensely questioned newsroom outsourcing. Long-distance editors might miss locally relevant nuances or fail to fill in context based on a knowledge of the region, said Bernard Lunzer, president of The Newspaper Guild-CWA.

“It may in the short run save costs. In the long run, what does it do to the quality of the product?” he said.

…he said most of the preproduction work for MediaNews’ papers in California is being done in India, a move he said cut costs by 65%.

“If you need to offshore it, offshore it,” he said.

Note: this poll is a multi vote poll, voting is secret and you are not forced to participate.

What will happen to Ewegen?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

3 thoughts on “MediaNews Boss plans to profit : Offshoring journalism’s future

  1. They seem to be in a dowanward spiral where they keep cutting costs, and in so doing, their product becomes less useful and fewer people read it. But I’m not sure there’s enough of a market for a quality paper either.

    And papers also face competition from the web. This site provides more info, and generally has it quicker than any old-line news source. The papers do have editors, experienced reporters who know the back story, and always have someone there for the major stories. But what is that worth to people.

    I do tend to agree with Libertad that moving it to India is not going to work. But I think Singleton is focused on cost cutting and so he’ll try this approach. And who knows, he might be right. The market will sort it out.

  2. it makes you SO much more credible, you have no idea. I disagree with Singleton’s logic though. Nobody is going to trust reports where the people aren’t there to do the work. How can someone in a foreign country write an article about something that is happening in Denver? This idea is like the newspaper business suicide-bombing itself instead of cutting its losses and still being alive.

    People will always want news, and newspapers are probably the most credible source there is–for now. Either the new media has to step up to the credibility plate, or the old media has to seriously rethink its business model.

    That said, the Libertad v. Eeweegun rivalry has reached a fever pitch.

  3. ..in Fargo or some right to work low cost state.  He or she never says anything that gives away the location.  

    And no traffic report on the mouse trap.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

84 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!