U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 20, 2008 10:47 PM UTC

No On Everything But A-59, Yes On All Referenda

  • 6 Comments
  • by: redstateblues

When you go to the polls to vote over the next 2 weeks, or fill out your mail-in ballot, I hope you’ll join me in voting “No” on Amendments 46-58. I also hope you’ll vote “Yes” on Amendment 59, Referenda L, M and N, and most importantly “Yes” on Referendum O.

The key reason why I will be voting “No” on all of these except for Amendment 59 is that nearly all of them benefit various special interest groups, and not the state as a whole. Many of them (Amendments 50, 51, 52, and 58, most notably) have noble causes they are trying to fight for. Everybody believes that community colleges, helping those with developmental disabilities, improving our roads, and giving scholarships so that college is an option for everybody, are important causes. They all deserve to be funded. Unfortunately, amending the constitution is not the way we should go about doing that.

Amendment 59 is the lone exception to this. K-12 education is not a special interest. It is a fundamental right for every child born in America to have a first-class public education. Amendment 59 makes sure that, in the future, when we have a strong economy (along with the tax dollars that go along with it) we can fund our schools properly. Everybody has seen the test scores in math and science compared to students around the world, and we all know how low we rank on that list. If we properly fund our school system, we can ensure that children who grow up here are learning the basic skills that they need to succeed in a global marketplace. Colorado should be a leader in education, not last in the country in funding it.

All of the Referenda are good measures, none more so than Referendum O. O would encourage people to try to make statutory changes to Colorado law, rather than changing the constitution. That way, if times change and circumstances require a change in the law, the state legislature can react quickly and make the changes instead of waiting for an election–or doing a costly special election.

One of the best things about Referendum O is that it makes it so citizens have to get signatures from fellow Coloradoans in each of Colorado’s Congressional districts. That way signature gatherers in Denver can’t get an amendment on the ballot that would affect the entire state with only Denver area signatures. It gets people from all different areas involved in the process.

The most important reason for passing Referendum O is to make it so that when Coloradoans vote in election as important as this one, they are not inundated with initiatives that cater to special interests–presented by both sides of the aisle.

Comments

6 thoughts on “No On Everything But A-59, Yes On All Referenda

  1. …how many times must that be said?

    If the only reason you have for opposing Amend. 51 is you don’t want to amend the constitution (that’s the only reason you suggested), you need to re-think it.

      1. …as I’ve not convinced myself yet.  Maybe different programs need funding… you may call these different programs “special interests” if you like.  They are the parts that make up the whole of the budget.  If the state’s revenue increased (because of increased income tax rates, or increased personal income, or increased sales tax rates, or increased sales, etc.), the legislature (TABOR aside, for the moment) would have to decide which “special interests” received the funds (e.g. transportation, education, tourism, heath care, etc.).  Is that a problem?  One could argue that this amendment is simply one way of increasing revenue and directing the legislature to do some specific thing with that revenue.  

        Also, I suppose one could argue that tying the lands of the legislature with heavy-handed citizens’ initiatives is a bad idea (anti-republican, perhaps).  But this “preferred form of government” argument is different from the “anti-special-interests” point that you raise, it seems.  Further, funding this particular “special interest” doesn’t take money directly from any other “special interest.”  It increases the total pot.  So, why would one have the need to prove which special interest is more “necessary”?

        1. Further, funding this particular “special interest” doesn’t take money directly from any other “special interest.”  It increases the total pot. So, why would one have the need to prove which special interest is more “necessary”?

          Lets just fund everything anyone wants this way as the money is “free.” After all, it will have no effect if we have a 1,385.02% sales tax. (sarcasm off)

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

54 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!