As the Washington Post reported yesterday:
When Karl Rove’s office requested special help for beleaguered Republican congressional candidates in the months before the 2006 elections, the head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy jumped to the task. Director John Walters was called a “superstar” by a Rove aide after carrying half-million-dollar grants to news conferences with two congressmen and a senator.
Walters’s visits to Utah, Missouri and Nevada were among at least 303 out-of-town trips by senior Bush appointees meant to lend prestige or bring federal grants to 99 politically endangered Republicans that year, in a White House campaign that House Democratic investigators yesterday called unprecedented in scope and scale. [Pols emphasis]
Federal law prohibits the use of public funds or resources for partisan activities — and specifically barred Walters’s office from any involvement in a federal election campaign — but the agencies involved said most of the trips were paid for by taxpayer funds, according to the draft report released by the Democratic majority of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. [Pols emphasis]
The report said that since the Rove aide and many others involved in organizing the trips are no longer in office, “there is no effective remedy” for any related violations of the 1939 Hatch Act, which restricts the use of public funds for partisan gain.
The report said the trips were freely described as political in subpoenaed e-mails and interviews. A list prepared at the White House two weeks before the election gave the names and dates of appearances by Cabinet secretaries in 73 key congressional districts, all under the heading “Final Push Surrogate Matrix.”
“This is,” the report said, “a gross abuse of the public trust.”
We were forwarded relevant excerpts from the report, with a name you’ll certainly recognize as a “beleaguered Republican congressional candidate.”
Which would seem to indicate Marilyn Musgrave had better have some very good excuses when the reporters start calling (soon, think fast over there). This probably won’t require the same degree of bug-eyed hyperbole to shoot a fairly devastating TV spot. And stay tuned, there’s a lot more to this story we’ll be talking about.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: allyncooper
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Colorado Challenges Trump’s (First) Unconstitutional Penstroke
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Colorado Challenges Trump’s (First) Unconstitutional Penstroke
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Colorado Challenges Trump’s (First) Unconstitutional Penstroke
BY: spaceman2021
IN: MLK Day 2025 Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Except in the information age. Talk about lack of transparency in government.
Markey’s campaign was floundering.
Markey’s mishandling of the attacks by Musgrave turned the momentum around. These revelations if handled well by Markey might turn things back in her favor. This is not only a close race but a hot one with charge after new allegation filling the air.
If Musgrave loses who will be the Republican candidate in 2010? Can anyone stop Bob Schaffer if he wants to go back to Congress. Schaffer has no chance of beating Udall but is still well liked in his old Congressional District.
First, we have to see if Shaffer wins the Senate race and Musgrave wins the House.
In the event both lose, It’s ludicrous to think Republicans would nominate a two-time loser over up and coming guys like Cory Gardner — and even sillier to think Schaffer would want the job.
So certain are you?
[/yoda voice]
We mean Schaffer wanting the job, of course. He’s said his biggest mistake was the term limits pledge.
Give such bucks oil companies do.
with your reasoning, I do…
I see no way that Schaffer wins a Senate seat. The latest scandal probably cooks Musgrave’s goose.
So many Republicans, Ken Buck, Cory Gardner, Scott Renfro and Marc Hillman want to run for Congress. Would they challenge Schaffer in a primary in 2010? Schaffer seems to love politics and power more than making money.
Speaking of Markey. What exactly is inaccurate in the claims made by Musgrave? If she is found guilty of the law Musgrave accuses her of violating she faces up to five years. The same law by the way that Senator Ted Stevens is on trial for violating.
You can bet that if there was anything real, absolutely anything, that the Bush Justice Dept would be having a very public “investigation” of Markey right now.
This “investigation” isn’t even one, it is at the urging of partisan hacks engaged in the middle of a campaign, and it is going nowhere. No charges will even be brought.
Ted Stevens – having your Alaska chateau renovated entirely for free in exchange for favors or influence absolutely hands down is ten times far more serious than Syscom being listed as a woman owned business on some government document.
Get real.
Plus if representative Musgrave is found guilty of murdering JonBenet Ramsey she could go to prison for life. True Story!
That sums it up precisely colo76.
Damn, we need an investigation. Find out the facts and report back Nov. 5.
To release the commercial first though, cause who needs facts when you have an investigation.
We hang first, schedule the fair trial later.
BTW, this is also beginning to hit next door, where former USDA Secretary and former Governor Johanns is running for the Nebraska Senate seat against Scott Kleeb.
You’ll note Johanns’ name in the Federal Department Heads For Musgrave list above.
According to the report’s appendix (which Colorado Pols drew its info on Musgrave from), Scott Tipton had one administration visit on the government’s dime. He still lost.
Bob Beauprez had two visits. He still lost.
And “ethics” candidate Rick O’Donnell had eight (Secretaries of Commerce, EPA, HHS, USDA, VA, Energy, and–twice–Education). He still lost.
http://oversight.house.gov/doc…
Sen. George Allen (R-VA) had four visits from administration officials.
In case you don’t recall, he also lost.
I don’t think this has traction with average voters.
It’s “inside baseball” stuff.
Now if somebody goes to jail sometime in the next 18 days, maybe it will be important to the election.
But we all know that’s not going to happen.
Great story, great scandal, no legs.
What’s the maximum penalty for violating the Hatch Act? Multiple that by four, since she violated it four times, and let’s run negative attack ads with black and white pictures of Musgrave behind bars saying “she could face up to 20 years in prison…”
any takers?