U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 06, 2008 03:40 AM UTC

That union agreement with business is sure working great! Now Jake Jabs is taking on Amendment 47.

  • 14 Comments
  • by: MileHighDaredevil

Of course Jake’s only big reason is some of the other anti-union states around us have right to work. Not any other arguments with any meat. But since he is one of the most well known persons in the state, I’m afraid non-union people will agree with him.

He can take his cheap furniture and…

Comments

14 thoughts on “That union agreement with business is sure working great! Now Jake Jabs is taking on Amendment 47.

      1. I must admit, the really expensive elitist piece we got from Stickley (North Carolina).

        But you can’t go wrong with AFW, especially for the kids stuff, end tables, rugs, carpeting, etc…

        1. As a former finish carpenter and someone who still builds pieces of furniture on occasion–very few manufacturers have the quality of Stickley, but many used to.

          If I want cheap crap I’ll order it from Ikea.

            1. Unions built the American Middle class.

              I used to know Jake Jabs (my boss 20 years ago– they worked together on libertarian and anti union causes) and he is no friend of the working man.

              We wants people poor, his business model is built on working folks with non union wages buying his Chinese made crap by non union workers.

              You are correct about the furniture though.

              1. Based on your logic, the goal of any good businesses (Jabs has a good model, he is #1 in the market) is to target the poorest people. Further, if they are not poor enough you help them get more poor. This way they have less money to spend with you and others and your business valuations increases exponentially. I do have this concept you put forth correct, right?

                Now I know this is the Barney Frank business model for American home ownership. Discount any rational judgement, lower credit barriers and juice up the market without any controls. Go look at Hudson City Bancorp (HCBK) and see how they avoided Barney’s business consulting services.

                1. Your explainations of economics and business models make no sense.  Different businesses have different target customers: AFW are people who can’t afford good furniture.

                  I don’t know anything about baseball, so I can’t comment on your metaphor.  I try not to talk about things I don’t know anything about.

                  You should try it.

    1. Our government workers have the Right-to-Work and Governor Ritter built on this foundation when he unionized 32,000 state workers.

      Shouldn’t the rest of Colorado have these same rights to choose. Look at what ColoradoWINS has done under Right-to-Work.

      It’s not risky at all. In fact, it will help make the labor unions stronger for all Coloradans.

      The losers with Right-to-Work are labor union bosses and corporate bosses. Now they actually have to be competitive and deal straight. Same goes for Amendment 54. Too bad Amendment 53 was bought-off, that is another good one I’ll be voting for even though my vote doesn’t count.

      1. Are you going to continue to post here after the election, whether 47 passes or not?

        If you are, what are you going to write about? I’m just curious.

        If you left, I think Bob would secretly miss you. 🙂

        1. I’ll be here. Just think of all the pro Union bills that will be run when 47 and 54 pass.

          Some union bills will be fair and good for Colorado, others may not be. I’ll be here to comment either way.

          None of you seem to ever see my comments on other items, note I now understand 49 and am not promoting it.

          Unlike Ewegen, who wants hurt labor unions by taking away a fair and efficient process for (not forced) union dues contributions, I don’t desire to put up additional barriers for union members.

          Ewegen also opposes 54 because of his love affair with Xcel I guess. Come on Bob all they have to do is change the law. After 54 passes they’ll change the law because Xcel pumps a lot of $’s into politics and these political bosses won’t stand for the tap to be capped with some silly Amendment.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

132 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!