(Delightful troll bait – promoted by Colorado Pols)
The GJ Sentinel has just posted their editorial for tomorrow: ‘No’ on Amend. 47:
We believe people should have the right to choose whether they belong to a labor union or pay dues to a union, but we have several problems with Amendment 47, which would enshrine those rights in the Colorado Constitution.
First, it sets too broad a definition of labor unions, possibly including even groups that promote workplace safety or job-related education, according to the Blue Book analysis of the measure.
…Additionally, even information supplied by supporters of Amendment 47 shows Colorado ranks in the top five states in the country for its business-friendly atmosphere. Clearly, existing labor laws aren’t a deterrence to business in this state.
That could change drastically, however, thanks to the labor backlash generated when 28-year-old Jonathan Coors – a member of the brewing family and an executive at CoorsTek in Golden – put the Amendment 47 campaign together.
…With or without such an agreement, we believe Coloradans should vote against Amendment 47 and all four of the labor ballot measures. Then perhaps we can return to sensible discussions about labor laws and not engage in dueling ballot measures that amount to mutually assured destruction of our business and worker rights.
No more after the fold…Have at it Libertad.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Thorntonite
IN: The Republican Field for Congress in CO-08
BY: bullshit!
IN: Speaker Johnson Frowns On Dave Williams’ Primary Chicanery
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I never thought I’d agree with the GJ Sentinel.
…And while we’re at it, no on 46, 48, 49 and 54. (And what else?)
Let’s just go no on pretty much everything this year. Our state constitution shouldn’t be a test balloon for special interest initiatives.
A pox on both your houses.
This counters the Boulder Daily Camera’s Vote YES on 47 editorial and as I have said before most could give three turds about the conspiring unions, politicians, and corporations that partner to destroy peoples rights. Therefore, its YES on 47, 49, and 54.
Further it sets up the GJS to strenuously support Right-to-Work after the labor union terrorists destroy Colorado or as the Obamians attempt to institute card check.
Remember, you only need 50% + 1 to win.
Seriously. Did you just call hard working Americans terrorists? WTF is wrong with you? YOU truly are apart of the blame America first crowd.
I think LB first came out with ballot terrorists or union economic terrorists. Needless to say it sure has caught on as a catch phrase.
Which reminds me of the total lack of consistency in the unions position — their purpose to give workers a voice.
LB and Libertad call people terrorists and think it’s funny.
A trashcan, a candy bar and some birds.
Voting YES on 47, 50% of existing Union members* who would like real employee free choice.
opposing 47 Union Bosses, Politicians and Corrupt Corporate Bosses.
*according to Ernie Duran, UFCW president, 50% of his members would choose to leave the UFCW if they had the Right-to-Work.
n/t
seems to represent the ideals of Corrupt Corporate Bosses
Denver Chamber opposed to Right-to-Work … that will play so well in Dallas and Chicago business development circles.
Has Murdoch put in a call to Joe Blake asking just what the Denver Chamber stands for in terms of business principles?
to crush worker’s rights. Hatred of free labor unions is a keystone of fascist states.
two other groups that hate Democratic unions.
What a joke. You could care less about “peoples rights”. You just care about your party and your dying ideology. Vote No on 47, 49 and 54 and yes on 53 and 55. Let’s bring about some balance between people and Wall street.
then by all means vote for 55. However, if you actually care about workers and jobs then vote no on 55 because it’s a job killer and therefore anti-worker.
Every time unions request ANY law to protect employees, somebody will say “it is a job killer” and I mean every time. With more Wal-mart and American Furniture being counted jobs among those counted, I will take my chances with true democracy in the workplace, not a trust us “at will” approach.
Union Bosses, Politicians and Corrupt Corporate Bosses cut a deal to hurt workers and trample on the rights of the people to speak their voice at the poll.
NOT!
it would be a job where I wasn’t part of a union!
I have to admit that it’s better than a Freedom’s Watch ad in terms of assuming its audience is stupid. But not by much.
And actor is very high on the list – a union job.
Looks like astronauts don’t have unions, though.
Libertad thinks that fire fighters, police officers, and actors are all terrorists.
Did I wake up in bizarro-world? Someone pinch me. The Sentinel?
On Oct. 1, he predicts The Denver Post “might say yes” on Amendment 49.
What insight. He must be relying on secret information from Jonathan Coors…who may have actually read the Sept. 29 Denver Post editorial endorsing Amendment 49!
Come on, Libertine, tell us your secret source! What next — will you predict the Japanese might attack Pearl Harbor?