John McCain yesterday spoke about the financial crisis. Here are his recommendations:
First, to deal with the immediate crisis, I will lead in the creation of the Mortgage and Financial Institutions trust — the MFI. The underlying principle of the MFI or any approach considered by Congress should be to keep people in their homes and safe guard the life savings of all Americans by protecting our financial system and capital markets. This trust will work with the private sector and regulators to identify institutions that are weak and fix them before they become insolvent. The MFI is an early intervention program to help financial institutions avoid bankruptcy, expensive bailouts and damage to their customers. This will get the Treasury and other financial regulatory authorities in a proactive position instead of reacting in a crisis mode to one situation after another.
The MFI will restore investor and market confidence, build sound financial institutions, assist troubled institutions and protect our financial system while minimizing taxpayer exposure. This is an important step, but it is not enough. I will also take the additional actions needed to make sure a crisis like this is never allowed to build and break over the American people again.
Second, I will propose and sign into law reforms to prevent financial firms from concealing their bad practices. An inexcusable lack of financial transparency allowed Wall Street firms to engage in reckless behavior that padded their profits and fattened executive bonuses when times were good, but now imperil the financial security of millions of Americans when their bets turned sour.
So much of the damage to our economy could have been avoided if these practices had been exposed to the light of day. Americans have a right to know when their jobs, pensions, IRAs, investments, and our whole economy are being put at risk by the recklessness of Wall Street. And under my reforms for the financial sector, that fundamental right will be protected.
Third, we need regulatory clarity. The lack of transparency in our financial markets went unnoticed by the regulatory agencies scattered throughout Washington charged with protecting the common good. We’ve got the SEC, the FDIC, the CFTC, the SIPC, the OCC, the Fed. At best, this confusing assortment of regulators and institutions was egregiously lax in carrying out their responsibilities. At worst, they engaged in the old Washington game of guarding their bureaucratic turf, instead of safeguarding the public interest and protecting investors.
Many in the financial services industry also either forgot or neglected their duty to act ethically and honorably. This shortcoming was aided and abetted by the creation of financial instruments that allowed lenders to escape any responsibility for the risk of their loans. In the past, lenders had to pay a price if they made a bad loan. Today, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac worked with Wall Street to bundle together all these dicey subprime loans and then pushed them off on investors who didn’t have the tools of transparency needed to assess or even understand the risk.
The current system promotes confusion, encourages bureaucratic infighting and creates incentives for financial firms to cut corners. We need to enhance regulatory clarity by holding the same financial activity to one regulatory standard. We don’t need a dozen federal agencies doing the job badly — we need the best federal agencies to do the job right.
Fourth, we must ensure that consumers and investors are protected. Our regulatory system must protect consumers and investors by punishing individuals who engage in fraud, break contracts, or lie to customers — like the predatory lenders who know you can’t afford an adjustable rate mortgage, but mislead you into signing one. These actions are criminal and the people who commit them should be behind bars. And corporate governance rules will be reformed so that shareholders have a clear say in determining the pay of CEOs and other senior executives. On my watch, the consequences for corporate abuse will not be more enrichment, but more likely an indictment.
Fifth, in cases where failing companies seek taxpayer bailouts, the Treasury Department will follow consistent policies in deciding whether to guarantee loans. It must have well developed remedies for a financial crisis. With billions of dollars in public money at stake, it will not do to keep making it up as we go along.
Finally, the Federal Reserve should get back to its core business of responsibly managing our money supply and inflation. It needs to get out of the business of bailouts. The Fed needs to return to protecting the purchasing power of the dollar. A strong dollar will reduce energy and food prices. It will stimulate sustainable economic growth and get this economy moving again.
All of these measures will calm and help us to avoid future panics and disasters in the financial markets. But to get through this tough time for America, and to come out stronger, we need a strategy of economic growth. And the massive new tax burden that my opponent plans for the American economy is exactly the wrong answer. His tax increase — along with the enormous new federal programs he proposes — are the surest way to turn a recession into a depression. In every respect, the Obama tax hikes would make things even worse for the working people of this country.
Anyone can quibble with the various proposals to fix the financial mess. What’s important is that we know McCain is ready to take over leadership of the country.
Link is here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Air Slash
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Marla Robbinson
IN: Apparently Everyone Is Wrong Except For Gabe Evans
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Powerful Pear
IN: Get More Smarter Roundup for Thursday (May 15)
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Also interesting that not a single person has commented on it, AS…
it would be a lot easier to believe that he was going to become a regulator overnight.
“Minutes after conservative columnist George Will declared that the Senator was decidedly un-presidential is his unexpected call for the firing of SEC Chairman Chris Cox, Sam Donaldson, the long-time ABC hand, said that McCain’s erratic message on the economy again raised questions about his age.”
George Will, folks. Conservative columnist.
Oh yeah, John McCain.
This is the kind of thing I wish people would base their voting decisions on – sound leadership. Unfortunately, most people just go off what they hear in TV ads.
Thanks for posting this.
That’s NOT leadership, its sycophantical.
But that’s the only decisive activity from John McCain recently on the economy. He blows with the political winds, always a step behind reality.
Beth is correct, this is exactly what voters should base their decision on. Unfortunately, McCain provides not “sound leadership” but disturbing reversals.
He can’t decide whether he’s Phil Gramm or William Jennings Bryan. At least both those economic reformers actually believed what they said, even if one led the country to disaster with McCain in lockstep — until polls told him to change his mind.
Obama always needs a committee to make his decisions. You can’t hold committee meetings every time you need to decide which shoe to tie first.
I don’t want a leader who can’t change his mind, so when someone changes their mind about something because there is new information, that’s what I like to see.
But I also need to know a leader is going to lead – not follow and not look to the polls for how to think.
McCain has ticked off a lot of people over the years and it’s because he is his own person. He doesn’t follow “lockstep” with anyone.
Is that you Nancy?
While you allude to a leader as someone who makes rash decisions, I believe it be someone how makes sound judgement base upon the best information available. If you want to compare the “committees” of the two campaigns, by all means let’s do so.
McCain’s economic team includes Foreclosure Phil Gramm and Carly “Golden Parachute” Fiorino.
Barack Obama economic team includes individuals like the Oracle of Omaha Warren Buffet and former U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin. Even Alan Greenspan says America cannot afford John McCain.
Hands down, Obama wins.
who proposed a 9/11-style commission to “study” the current financial meltdown. (Since you don’t seem to be aware of your candidate’s actual activities and words, I’ll tell you who did: McCain.)
Smart people and good decision-makers put smart people with a variety of opinions around them — to think that McCain makes economic policy decisions all on his own without the help of best-buddy Phil Gramm is absurd. At least not the decisions that survive his switch-backs, redactions, clarifications and reversals. He probably does come up with the off-the-cuff remarks all by himself, which is why his leadership style is so dangerous. (You do realize most of those heated remarks he makes in the absence of cooler heads wind up corrected by his campaign before he makes it to the next rally, don’t you?)
McCain carried water for Phil Gramm for Gramm’s entire tenure in the Senate, especially on deregulation of the financial industry without oversight. That’s lockstep, whether you like to admit it or not.
What a week. I would be lying if I said I had a handle on all of it. What I do know is I like Henry Paulson. He appears to give the right tone of situation, which is important for all of us poor slugs that this financial mess is not at all clear.
I also like Michael Bloomberg – straight forward, knows his stuff. Today he said he has not endorsed a candidate yet, because he wants them to be open to hearing him on financial issues. That is putting country first.
Who I did not like is guess who, John McCain. In one week he called for firings and got mad at something. He did exactly what military training teaches you not to do – make rash decisions without all the answers and a clear understanding of the situation.
And he was mad. At what, exactly and at whom exactly, no one knows. But it is clear, John McCain was just mad. “Man yells at cloud” to quote Keith Olbermann.
Leadership is presenting a calm face, not making decisions you will later regret and gather a complete understanding of a situation before you fire the wrong guy and leave yourself without the benefit of continuity of past and future actions.
McCain did not achieve balance this week.
Is he The One these days, and is that a good or a bad thing?