President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 10, 2008 06:18 PM UTC

Legislature Keeps Mitts Off Thick Blue Book

  • 1 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Though not without some controversy, as the Denver Post reports:

Lawmakers on Tuesday battled over what information voters should get about a host of ballot measures affecting unions and businesses.

The tussle came as a committee of lawmakers finished approving language for the state’s “blue books,” which will be mailed to all registered voters through early October. Prepared by legislative staff, the booklets describe each measure on the November ballot – 18 this year – and lay out arguments for and against the measures…

Over hearings Monday and Tuesday, the committee approved only a few changes that were mostly technical. But lawmakers from both parties Tuesday tried to rewrite descriptions of ballot issues pushed by labor and business groups this year.

The blue book’s section on Amendment 47, the so-called “right to work” measure that says paying of dues or fees to a union cannot be a condition of employment, sparked criticism from Democrats.

The argument in favor of the amendment said: “Labor laws are a factor that businesses consider when deciding where to relocate or expand. Therefore, the measure may help the state as it competes with other states for new jobs and business investment.”

Sen. Lois Tochtrop, D-Thornton,said that was false and that businesses consider education, climate and other factors when relocating – not right-to-work laws. She tried to have the language deleted but could not muster the 12 votes needed.

Similarly, Republicans attacked blue-book descriptions for some of the measures unions are pushing in retaliation for the right-to-work measure.

A poll follows.

Will the Blue Book help or hurt with ordinary voters this year?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

One thought on “Legislature Keeps Mitts Off Thick Blue Book

  1. When the legislators write the Blue Book? Why is it that they do that again? Seems like we would all be better off if the Dems and Repubs on Pols wrote the arguments (Libertad excluded.)

    Seriously though, wouldn’t an independent political organization–one that can argue in a way that doesn’t include lying and distorting the facts of the amendments–do a better job explaining these things to the voters?

    And doesn’t the legislative body have enough to worry about without this?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

98 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!