The Who’ll Win in CD5 Poll a year ago shows how different things can look after a year.
Doug Lamborn – 17 votes (21.25%)
Jeff Crank – 63 votes (78.75%)
The charitable interpretation is that the addition of Rayburn to the mix that killed Crank’s chances. But there really was reason to think the Lamborn had no chance back then.
The diary it is attached to also has some interesting predictions in retrospect. A user with the handle Robert predicted that “If Rayburn jumps in and makes it three way, my bet is that he will split the anti-Lamborn vote with Crank and Lamborn will win with a 40-35-25 (Lamborn, Crank, Rayburn).”
The actual results were
Lamborn – 56,171 – 44.5%
Crank – 16,431 – 29.3%
Rayburn – 14,721 – 26.2%
A fairly close prediction, but the actual show a lot more support for Lamborn or at least for the incumbent. CD-5 Line was much further from the mark saying that he was “putting odds by a whisker in Crank’s favor in a 3 way.”
How could we all be so wrong? Well at that time there were all sorts of diaries about Lamborn accepting a gambling donation, not reporting it, and then threatening constituents who brought it up. An example is the diary Lamborn Comes Unglued on Aug. 31.
By September 5th it was looking really bad for Lamborn with ColoradoPols writing a diary with the headline The Day Doug Lamborn Self-Destructed.
In the end though all the talk of how damaging the House Ethics Investigation might be came to naught. Hardly anyone was talking about gambling and threats on primary day earlier this month. Part of that may have been the fact that the Colorado Springs Gazette was much kinder to Lamborn during the scandal than other newspapers. This comment by CD-5 Line is a pretty good example of that. He noted that the Post was much harder on the congressman. While I’m sure that some people in Colorado Springs read the Post and the News, more probably read the Gazette. The power of a hometown newspaper going easy on a local politician cannot be underestimated.
Plus things do change. A poll of ColoradoPols users attached to a diary on Sep. 11 last year found a clear plurality of 44.23% thinking Hillary Clinton would be the nominee of the Democratic Party. And Rudy Giuliani lead in a similar poll for the Republican question. More on those predictions later.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I think he single handedly turned it around for Lamborn. 😉
Did you ever consider that you just underestimated Doug Lamborn?
In all honesty, yes. I know I did
It it possible that I underestimated Lamborn, but I do not think I did. For one thing I have seen far greater politicians brought low by far smaller things that snowballed due to media attention.
Credit where credit is due, he did either had enough sense to shut up rather than digging in deeper with his mouth or someone who advised him to do that. That was an important factor. But he also was lucky and as in war luck is often more important than how good the leader is.
I’d promote it, but with the Palin announcement, it would probably be moved. Good work though!
I think the difference can be attributed to this: the anti-Lamborn movement peaked too soon. Lamborn became weak at a time when it was too tempting for both Crank and Lamborn to jump in. Not long after they jumped in, the momentum faded and Lamborn kept his head down and ran a good campaign that stayed on message. Crank and Rayburn got distracted by their in-fighting.
At the end of the day, Lamborn won and I will more happily support him from here on out.
“the anti-Lamborn movement peaked too soon”
We’ll promote it for tomorrow – but Palin has to be top line today.
No reason Palin shouldn’t be top today. After all that news is hot and this is the very definition of politically cold. I’m going to do more though. Now that we have all the players for president and VP I’m looking over what various posts here and elsewhere said about the picks.