I hope I’m reading too much into this, but today I was struck by a phrase in a Denver Post article. In a republished New York Times piece, the author says:
Obama’s advisors said Thursday that they believed he could raise $200 million to $300 million for the general election campaign,… if he were freed from the shackles of accepting public money.
Freed from the shackles? That seems to be a strange expression in this context, especially coming from Obama’s advisors. It almost appears this reference to slavery is implying that public campaign finance is just another way for the “white man” to keep Obama down. Was this Obama’s handlers intent to draw this comparison and play the race card or the author’s words? Either way, it doesn’t seem to be appropriate.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Boebert ‘Waiting for Michael Keaton’ To Invite Her to the Premiere of Beetlejuice 2
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Gun “Safety” Statistics Commonly Cited by Republican Lawmakers are Utter Nonsense
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Jerry Sonnenberg Finds His Voice After Boebert Votes Against Israel Aid
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Jerry Sonnenberg Finds His Voice After Boebert Votes Against Israel Aid
BY: Phoenix Rising
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Phoenix Rising
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: No Odor in the Pod (feat. Christy Powell)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Boebert ‘Waiting for Michael Keaton’ To Invite Her to the Premiere of Beetlejuice 2
BY: ParkHill
IN: Trump Hush Money Trial: Day Of The Pecker, Part 2
BY: ParkHill
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Or correct. I thought “shackles” was spelled with a C. Must be a way to identify with the bad spellers the white man is keeping down, too.
The public financing system has been completely overwhelmed in the past couple of election cycles. Limiting yourself to $84m of taxpayer money isn’t terribly wise when you’re collecting 90+% of your money from the general public in small donations.