President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
June 11, 2008 04:25 PM UTC
6 Comments
I say neither. Along with franking, this has to be the biggest non-issue of the day.
Voters I know are talking about gas prices, energy, economy, immigration, war -you know, important things. I don’t know of anyone who is voting on the almighty franking/earmarks issue
Schaffer is making earmarks a centerpiece of his campaign. You don’t think that’s approach is sound?
Hate to say it, but Shaffer’s not doing so hot. These sort of issues always strike me as “inside baseball”. I think the main issue for voters this season is energy (gas) prices. But that’s just me.
Earmarks is 10 times more important than Franking.
But its still No big Problem for Lamborn.
WHY?
Cause theres no there, there.
Lamborn is squeeky clean on the earmarks and campaign contribution issues. He has been on the right side of fiscal dicipline, before it was the issue du jour.
As I argued in this diary, the Post’s (and now Crank’s) contention that Lamborn’s measly take from defense PACs are somehow tied to his earmarks is absurd.
But you do realize, Newsman, that fiscal discipline has been an issue du jour since long before Lamborn won election to Congress, don’t you?
Republicans campaigning against “earmarks” is relatively recent, raised to neutralize scandalous earmarks inserted by embattled Republican lawmakers under investigation for the practice.
Not really.
Not with everyone.
Not with Liberals cira 1929-1999.
Not with most “moderates”
With me, yes.
Reagan, Goldwater, Yes.
With Jeffords, Snow, and other Rockefeller Republicans, NO, Not Really.