U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 27, 2013 07:04 AM UTC

Friday Open Thread

  • 21 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

"We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."

–Anais Nin 

Comments

21 thoughts on “Friday Open Thread

    1. Davie, if there were such a law, half of Congress (and all of the Tea Party faction) would blunder through the revolving door of lobbying and influence-mongering. (instead of waiting until they retire or are defeated in an election to do that).

      1. I know.  It just amazes and disgusts me that so many of these bozos get elected.  I guess districts get what they deserve.  It's just unfortunate that they wield influence outside their own districts.  But that's the nature of Democracy, for better or worse.

        It takes an informed and engaged electorate to solve this problem.

        1. Good luck with that, Davie. I live by something I call The Tigger (my real nickname) Principle. "People are stupid, ignorant and lazy. Given that, everything else makes sense."

           

          1. If you think that people are stupid, ignorant, and lazy, you have no future in politics–even behind the scenes.  That's an insult to the average voter.  I have more respect for the people than that.

            I'm a number cruncher, not a politician.  But still, what I'm always after is, "what do the people want?"

            They mignt not always be right according to the way you or I might look at things, but they always get what they want.  It might not always be the best for them, but it's what they want and dammit they got it.

            The secret is to get them to want what you want.

  1. Ralphie, I agree with you that the voters pretty much get what they want. In view of our local voters' selections – Tipton, King, Scott and Wright – we're getting it good and hard. So I disagree with you about respect for the voters. Why should I respect people who vote for those clowns, and then bitch that the Western Slope doesn't get respect?

      1. +10 Dio G. Your explanation of the causes of apathy is less judgmental of voters than other narratives that voters are "stupid" or "lazy". As in teaching, if one starts with the premise that "these kids can't" or "those kids will never…", not bothering to reach out to "stupid, lazy, reality TV obsessed apathetic voters" becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Pols is probably right in that some of the pro-66 outreach was mis-targeted, as well. In Colorado, you can't go wrong aiming for the moderate, unaffiliated voter.

        Why this obsession to insult Elliott?  Why would you not want to take seriously the one conservative  who bothers to try to debate you on this forum? I'd rather say that I don't take his arguments seriously.

        The PERA fungibility issue with A66 went on endlessly on this forum. It was full of hypothetical "What ifs".  Elliott wanted us to admit that in some conservative imagined world, school administrators would take  dollars allocated for schools before A66 and spend them on those darned contractually obligated teacher PERA pensions!

        Yawn. Elliott, did any public polling ever show that the general public was moved by the above argument not to vote for Amendment 66? Just curious.

        Woke up at 2 am, can't sleep…will try to find something more productive to do than post here…

         

         

        1. Good Morning, mamajama55,

          Welcome to my world! This is a time to be afraid, very afraid, because with one careless flick of the radio dial, you can find yourself in the maze of right wing talk radio….and there is a real danger of addiction….oh I know, people say that you can just try it once and leave it…..but it is risky

          business.  

          I think the radio waves are hyponotic.  Or, you could check out Coast to Coast AM for a more alien explanation….but then they can see into your home……

          Warm milk and russian novels might be an antidote…but it only worked briefly for me……

      2. Bingo! we have a winner. Spot on Dio.

        Take our last Senate race where Bennet was clearly better than Buck but still what a choice. That was like choosing to have my arm broken over the alternative of having both arms cut off.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

143 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!