Attorney General Won't Prosecute Trailhead Group

12 thoughts on “Attorney General Won’t Prosecute Trailhead Group”

1. Ah – I see the difference. This was pointed disregard. All that tricky legalese mumbo-jumbo.

   Log in to Reply

2. Yeah, people should check Mitch Morrisey’s reports too, since he declined to investigate. I guess he doesn’t want to bite the hand that feeds either. Wait…he’s a Democrat. Isn’t there any DA willing to investigate? They must all be under the thumb of Trailhead. The horror!

   Log in to Reply

3. I love when the D’s talk about Trailhead’s donors and Les when he talks about Suthers donors.

   I wish the R’s could talk about Research and Democracy’s donors, but we can’t because they are “unidentified donors.”

   Now, they’ll come after me for reckless statements, right?

   Log in to Reply

4. Re “unidentified donors”
   How about the Independence Institute’s donors?  Shall we talk about them again?  Remember the courts actually decided after the last election that they didn’t have to disclose because of their “claim” that they were doing education.  Turn about is fair-play huh?

   Log in to Reply

5. Trailhead’s simply calling out the Dems on secret mailers.  Research & Democracy’s gifts might be legal, but not disclosing names is clearly bad government.  Common Cause has called for these in-kind gifts to be banned.  Trailhead zinging the Dems for these gifts pails in comparison with the tactics Gill, Stryker, Polis, Bridges employed against countless Republicans in 2004.

   Log in to Reply

6. I wonder what constitutes ‘reckless disregard’? This must have just been your average, run-of-the-mill disregard.

   Log in to Reply

7. See, “reckless” means “without reckoning”.  Since Trailhead did this with a lot of reckoning, it can’t be “reckless disregard”.  (snark)

   (in reality, “reckless disregard” means “complete indifference to the safety and rights of others”, but again, it’s not so much indifference, its active malice in this case…)

   So how’s Mr. Suthers’ campaign finance report looking?  Any Trailhead donors on that list that might put him in a compromising position on this decision?  Or maybe one of Trailhead’s founders did him a favor in the recent past?  Nah, couldn’t be.

   Log in to Reply

8. Well well.  What a shock!  Som the trail of slime extends to and is protected by the Attorney Generals office now.  I have always felt that this was a major flaw in our system.  There is almost nothing to stop a Demcratic AG from ignoring Republican suits and vice versa.

   NIce going John Suthers.  You suck.

   Log in to Reply

9. Nothing except basic decency, which Suthers is demonstrating he lacks.  First the contradictory ruling on Sen. Fitz-Gerald, now this.  When do the voter role purges begin here in Colorado?

   Log in to Reply

10. Whatever.

    You righties can go right ahead and keep rolling about in the slime.  The fact of the matter here is that ol’ John “Bitchboy” Suthers is not doing his job.

    But no matter.  You all are goin down anyway.  This Trailhead tactic just shows how desperate your situation is getting.

    Log in to Reply

11. Why not sign the petition for Suthers to actually do his job.

    http://www.petitiononline.com/soapblx2/petition.html

    TRAILHEAD is a Republican slush fund.

    Log in to Reply

12. What a providential time to identify how the Archdiocese of Denver goes hand in hands with theTrailhead – Opus Dei Spiritual Adultery Adultery

    Such a tragic time in history – what witness do we have to the terrorists except Scribes and Pharisees – Money Changers in the Temple

    Log in to Reply