Andrew Bacevich’s son was just killed in Iraq.
Doug Lamborn said this about the President’s veto of funds for our troops:
“I cannot support any legislation that ensures defeat in Iraq, puts our national security at risk, and enables uncontrolled spending.”
Since our troops are going on their third/fourth/fifth tours and being sent on the deadliest missions the president could order, is Doug willing to personally sacrifice anything for the furtherance of our military and the replacement of the more than 100 soldiers killed this month?
Or does Doug only want the children of his constituents to fight a war he claims is the most important in history?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Early Worm
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Trump/Vance Campaign Following Heidi Ganahl Playbook
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: How Mayor Mike And A Slumlord Invented The “Takeover” Of Aurora
BY: harrydoby
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments