Republican Secretary of State Mike Coffman has been under increasing fire lately for his own mistakes, and as much as his office likes to pretend that he is a victim of unfair criticism, there’s no denying the fact that Coffman puts himself in these bad positions time and time again.
Today Coffman spoke at a gathering of Republicans in Larimer County, just a few days after speaking to Mesa County Republicans. There wouldn’t be anything wrong with this if Coffman hadn’t instituted his own policies last Thursday preventing his employees – but excluding himself – from taking part in political party activities.
But according to the watchdog group Citizens for Ethics in Government, Coffman’s new policies aren’t even legal:
Colorado Citizens for Ethics in Government (CCEG) today called on Secretary of State Mike Coffman to repeal sections of a new internal policy he announced in the wake of allegations that one of his top staff operated a partisan side-business. CCEG says the policy is unconstitutional.
Portions of the new policy prohibit state employees from making contributions to a partisan organization or political party, candidate for a partisan office, or an organization that is working for or against a statewide ballot initiative or a referendum. The Supreme Court has held in Buckely v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 19, 22 (1976) that limiting contributions is an unconstitutional impingement on First Amendment rights.
“In a hasty attempt to prevent political fall-out from the allegations facing his office, Secretary Coffman imposed a new policy on his staff that is blatantly unconstitutional,” said CCEG Director Chantell Taylor. “The ability to make a contribution is a constitutionally protected freedom of expression and association that extends to every citizen, including public employees.”
“State law and personnel rules are already in place to prevent public employees from engaging in outside activities that are incompatible with their official duties. Secretary Coffman should immediately repeal his new policy and instead pledge to follow and enforce the laws already on the books.”
If CCEG is correct, the good news for Coffman is that he won’t be contradicting his own rules anymore. Of course, the bad news is that he might have created a new problem trying to solve another problem.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: Lauren Boebert Joins The Flat Earth Society?
BY: cgrandits
IN: Biggest Veep Debate Ever Open Thread
BY: Genghis
IN: “Dr. Phil” Jumps On Board The Aurora Crazy Tren
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Biggest Veep Debate Ever Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: “Dr. Phil” Jumps On Board The Aurora Crazy Tren
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Biggest Veep Debate Ever Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Biggest Veep Debate Ever Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Biggest Veep Debate Ever Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I think I agree with a lot of people who post here that Coffman made some goofs, OK, but enough of making an issue of an elected statewide official speaking to groups within his own party.
You have to be active and visible within your own party and dance with the one that brung ya – this is customary and normal, and is no scandal. Plus the guy seems like a pretty damn solid guy even if he dosen’t share the same party affiliation as me.
I am inclined to give the guy a friggin break, so how ya like them apples. Now I have to report to Dem party headquarters and perform ritual seppoku.
….as my Aunt Dorothy says, “if you don’t like my apples, don’t shake my tree!”
Good luck with the ritual…….don’t forget to donate before you leave. 🙂
LOL Cuervo !
This has taken on a life of it’s own to the point that if he blows his nose, it’s a sign of problems. But he does have to address the root issues.
Would have been smart of him to cancel all political appearances for a bit. And he needs to take ownership of the mistake and fire his associate.
I think he can recover. But he needs to address it to do so.
This is only an issue because Coffman made it an issue. Nobody would have questioned speaking to political groups before he issued his own rules restricting employees from being politically active.
Mike Coffman thinks Mike Coffman invented ethics. Does Mike Coffman thinks Mike Coffman invented elections, too? And does Mike Coffman talk like Bob Dole about Mike Coffman?