As you may be aware, I am running for the Denver Election Commission. I think we all agree that our last election was an absolute disaster. There are many people calling for major changes, and I would like to solicit the opinions of the readers here.
Below are four options currently being considered. I would appreciate hearing your opinions on which are better. Or, if you have a better idea yet, I’d love to hear it.
I intend to serve my best at whatever the voters elect me to do: be a transitional Commissioner until a single person is elected in November; serve a full 4-year term; or go back to my “day job.” I have no intention of running for County Clerk; other people are better suited for the whole of that job, it’s elections — and voters — that I care about.
OPTION 1 – KEEP THE CURRENT STRUCTURE.
Make no changes to the current structure of the Commission (2 are elected, 1 is appointed by the Mayor and serves as Clerk). This is not preservation of the status quo; people clearly expect some personnel changes even if this scenario wins. If elected to a full 4-year term, I will immediately begin a full review of all personnel from the top down and, with my fellow Commissioners, make decisions about who to keep and what job duties to reassign or reorganize. The Information Technology organization (my profession) will be thoroughly scrutinized and, if necessary, totally revamped.
OPTION 2 – ELECT A CLERK IN MAY
This is Auditor Dennis Gallagher’s proposal. The question of what to do about the structure of the Commission would be on the May ballot. This proposal would have people running for the office of County Clerk on the same ballot, even though it has not been approved by the voters yet. It would allow the Clerk to get a running start on running the 2008 elections, but it also means some people (either Commissioner or Clerk candidates) will be raising money and campaigning for an office they won’t take even if they win. There are some legal questions here that the city attorneys are still researching.
OPTION 3 – ELECT A CLERK IN NOVEMBER
The question of whether to change the structure would be on the May ballot and then, if successful, a County Clerk would be elected in November. Under this proposal, if the ballot question fails, the Commission continues on as before. This is Councilwoman (and former Clerk and Recorder) Rosemary Rodriguez’s proposal.
OPTION 4 – ELECT A DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS
This is being promoted by Councilwoman (and former Election Commissioner) Marcia Johnson. This would work the same as Option 3, but the elected post in Nov. would be specifically a Director of Elections. The County Clerk would remain appointed by the Mayor, but have no involvement with elections. This Dir. of Elections would be a full-time elected position with adequate pay to attract competent candidates. If the voters of Denver really want to change the structure, this is my personal preference. I have not yet decided if I would run for this position.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: scarter
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s A Weekend Town Hall-Palooza Featuring Absent Gabe Evans
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: Uber Bullies Lawmakers To Protect Bad Drivers
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Karen posted this question on both ColoradoPols and SquareState and has attended several meetings around the city in the past two weeks of various political groups, public officials’ meetings, and neighborhood organizations where this topic has come up.
So far the over-whelming concensus (90% or better) has been to keep the structure the same. Most people realize that an elected clerk or election official probably would not have made much diffrence in the type of problems that occurred on election day. People who work closely with the election process or have a good understanding of the ins and outs of that process are also realizing the challenges that being a City AND County will bring to an elected County Clerk who also has to being the sole overseer of elections.
Despite the apparent lack of support, Dennis Gallagher is moving forward with his proposal which is an initiative (has to petition onto the ballot). There will be a meeting on Tuesday to confirm the ballot language. When that is confirmed, it will appear on Karen’s website: http://www.karenmorrissey.org
Dan Willis, Campaign Manager
Karen Morrissey for Election Commission
It took me a minute to go back and read up on how many signatures will be needed to get gallagher’s proposal on the ballot.
The City Charter refers us back to the Colorado Constitution (Art. XX, Sec. 9) which requires signatures equal to 5% of the number of people who voted in the most recent Governor’s race. 157,454 people voted in that race so 5% is 7873.
It is interesting that Gallagher will get to benefit from the supporessed vote in Denver last month. If an additional 20,000 had voted (which is now a good guesstimation of how many tried and gave up), he would need another 1000 votes to get his proposal on the ballot.