U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser (D) Joe Neguse (D) Michael Bennet
50% 50% 50%
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) Brian Mason

60%↑

30%↑

20%↓

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%↑

30%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 24, 2024 08:02 AM UTC

Wednesday Open Thread

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“The art of statesmanship is to foresee the inevitable and to expedite its occurrence.”

–Charles Maurice de Talleyrand

Comments

6 thoughts on “Wednesday Open Thread

  1. I would like to believe that if someone with the temperment of Donald Trump wanted to advance the causes that I believe in (affordable healthcare, social programs to reduce the load on public safety, public education, etc.) that I would still not support such a person for any public office, especially the President.

    However I find it hard to believe that someone with Trump's temperment could be the kind of person to advance the causes I believe in.

    This is in response to thinking of folks who say "Yeah, Trump is a fucking lunatic and I don't trust him as far as I could throw him, but I like his policies."

  2. A Republican named Heather Graham just won the Pueblo Mayor's election, defeating the incumbent. No, not THAT Heather Graham, baby. Not sure that's great news for hopes of flipping CD3, since Pueblo's the largest debatably blue city in the district, but local elections usually have unique backstories. https://www.chieftain.com/story/news/politics/elections/local/2024/01/23/heather-graham-wins-2024-pueblo-mayoral-runoff-against-nick-gradisar/72330345007/

  3. I hate to trash Polis 2 days in a row, but he just canned the venerable Bernie Buescher from the State Board of Equalization, and replaced him with a Republican which flipped the Board majority. Again this whole thing is debatable, but it seems to me that Buescher made an adult decision not to approve a Douglas County property tax cutting decision, that according to some sources would have forced the state to backfill lost revenues for a very wealthy county.

    Don't get me wrong, I'll take a tax cut if it comes my way, but I do know they can have consequences for fiscal matters and services for those who can't otherwise afford them. Damn the torpedoes, I guess.

    https://coloradosun.com/2024/01/24/jared-polis-state-property-tax-board/

  4. AP reports a case about No Labels:   When is a group that has “party status” NOT a “party”?

    The group Accountable.US filed its complaint in Colorado, where No Labels has qualified for party status, arguing that the group has failed to file quarterly campaign finance reports, as required under state law. It aims to force No Labels to reveal who its donors are.

    Colorado includes an exemption for groups that are also registered with the FEC. But the complaint argues that No Labels’ efforts to “hide behind” its national organization “would create a dangerous gap in Colorado’s campaign finance law, and allow national groups to funnel dark money into Colorado’s elections via state-level organizations.”

    No Labels chief strategist Ryan Clancy disputed the suggestion that the group had run afoul of campaign finance law. He pointed to a federal case called Unity08 v. FEC, which he said established a precedent sanctioning its approach.

    Clancy said No Labels is not required to register as a political committee “so long as we are not actively supporting any specific candidate.”

    But Noti, who was one of the attorneys who argued the case, said there are key differences between the 2010 case and what No Labels is doing now, characterizing the current argument as a bit “too cute.” In this instance, while No Labels may not be advocating for a specific candidate, they are advocating against both Biden and Trump, who are

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

80 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols