U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser (D) Joe Neguse (D) Michael Bennet
50% 50% 50%
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) Brian Mason

60%↑

30%↑

20%↓

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%↑

30%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 03, 2024 08:15 AM UTC

Wednesday Open Thread

  • 10 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“The difference between a cult and a religion, of course, lies in extremity.”

–Benjamin Wittes

Comments

10 thoughts on “Wednesday Open Thread

  1. The Pitchfork Ruling. Timothy Snyder

    Must Read. Extremely well written.

    Donald Trump cannot be a candidate for any state or federal office in the United States of America.  Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution makes this plain.  No office-holding insurrectionist can return to office.  The language is clear, and the facts of his case are not in dispute.

    The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled to this effect, and the United States Supreme Court is now called upon to review its finding (in Anderson vs. Griswold).  In my last post, I addressed arguments against the Constitution that I heard or read in the Midwest over the holidays.  In this essay, I address the anti-Constitutional discourse that appears in the media: that the Constitution should be displaced by the fears of people who appear on television. 

    This form of opposition to the Constitution poses as expertise.  It takes the form of advice to the Court: find some way to allow Trump to be on the ballot, because otherwise people will be upset.  Because we are used to hearing endless conversations about politics on television, where everyone seems to be a political advisor, it can seem normal to reduce sections of the Constitution to talking points.  But we must pause and consider.

    In fact, rejecting the legal order in favor of what seems to be politically safe at a given moment is just about the most dangerous move that can be made.  It amounts to advocating that we shift from constitutional government to an insurrectionary regime.  Indeed, it amounts to participating in that shift, while not taking responsibility for doing so.  Let me try to spell this out.

    1. Our corrupt SCOTUS, which has been executing a slow coup ever since Gore v Bush ( Citizens United, eviscerating the voting right act, allowing gerrymandering) will either 1) put it’s finger in the wind and decide Trump cannot win and eliminate him , or 2) make up law to say he can run because he hasn’t been convicted of insurrection 

    1. That ship already sailed, Gilpin Guy. Don't you remember at the RNC meeting a couple of years back when they literally had a golden calf-type statue of Trump in front of which people could pose and take selfies?

  2. CO-4 update from Axios aggregation: 

    "Colorado House Minority Leader Mike Lynch is running for the congressional seat held by U.S. Rep. Ken Buck,"  Cite is to Denver Post, but Colorado Politics also says "Mike Lynch's entry into the primary brings to 11 the number of Republicans running in the district."

    Not sure this will be a winning sentiment.  Why is he running?

    "For the same reason I ever got into this business is that I was sick of idiots freaking representing me in the different levels," Lynch said in an interview with Colorado Politics before declaring his candidacy. "That's kind of a core thing of why I even do any of this."

  3. This story might be best for the morning, but it's a small stick of dynamite about Hiedi's latest plan to take Colorado back to its 2004-ish red hue, or maybe even farther back. Polsters should read it. The former University of Colorado Regent is teaming up with one of the namesakes of a University of Colorado business building to establish a new tighty-righty messaging network, and according to this story they hope to work with Anschutz news outlets to spread the word. I read "The Blueprint" some time ago, but I'm not sure this latest red scheme is what the blue architects had in mind!

    https://coloradotimesrecorder.com/2024/01/common-sense-institute-chairman-among-wealthy-conservatives-backing-heidi-ganahls-plan-to-retake-colorado/58780/

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

76 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols