David and Goliath : Paladino Files Suit Against Gessler

(Ballsy move. Me likey.   – promoted by Middle of the Road)

In a gutsy move by a relatively unknown Democratic candidate in a Republican stronghold, SD27 Candidate David Paladino issued this press release today. Paladino joined Colorado AFL-CIO Executive Director Mike Cerbo, Pro-choice Colorado, the Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains Ballot Issue Committee, and Citizens for Integrity, in calling CO Secretary of State Scott Gessler’s latest actions “unconstitutional”.

If Paladino is this gutsy in his first political move, do Pols readers have a prediction for what might happen in his race against David Balmer?  

   State Senate Candidate David Paladino Joins Suit Against Rules Increasing Secrecy in Political Financing

   Paladino calls new rules a welcome mat to political corruption

   Centennial — A lawsuit aimed at stopping Secretary of State Scott Gessler from vastly increasing secret political spending in Colorado was joined by CO Senate District 27 Democratic candidate David Paladino on Friday, April 6th.

   Paladino, who is seeking his first term in office to represent an area that covers Centennial, called the new rules “an insult and a welcome mat to potential corruption by rolling back campaign finance disclosures and preventing Colorado voters from knowing who is funding political campaigns, a right we all have today. It will bring political spending in Colorado to new lows.”

   Under these new rules, Gessler says that a county or city political party where there’s home rule may now funnel money to its state party without reporting who donated the funds, no matter how much.  He also loosens the restrictions on when a political party, issue committee or other political organization must report contributions and expenditures, making it possible for special interests to avoid disclosure.  Hundreds of thousands of dollars in political spending would be obscured as a result.

   “Colorado’s constitution has long protected voters and citizens from back-room funding of local candidates and campaigns,” said Paladino, “but now the Secretary of State wants to turn the tables around so that millions of dollars could be potentially funneled into political use without the public knowing about it.

   “This ignores our state’s constitutional protections against secret money in politics and it violates every sense that we have that  political money has to be out in the open so we know who is being supported by what interests, and how. Voters deserve to know that.”

   The legal action was filed in Denver District Court.  Included as plaintiffs along with Paladino are Mike Cerbo, Colorado AFL-CIO executive director, Pro-Choice Colorado, the PPRM Ballot Issue Committee, and Citizens for Integrity, Inc.  Colorado Common Cause filed a similar suit on Friday.

   The court is being asked to stay rules that Gessler created in March because the Secretary of State overstepped the authority and legal bounds of his office. It also says that the rules are in violation of Colorado’s clearly-defined constitutional requirements for political contributions and spending.

   “It’s been a long-time right for voters in our state to know who is backing whom and what,” said Paladino, “and Scott Gessler has no right to change that.”


Will Gessler Get Away With His Newest Rule Interpretations?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

About nancycronk

Nancy Cronk is a longtime community activist and women's leader living in Arapahoe County. Six months before the historic "red sweep" election of 2014, she was recruited to run as a "placeholder" in HD37, and managed to bring in 40K from 500 small donors, and 42% of the vote -- just one point lower than the previous candidate who ran in a presidential year.

17 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. ArapaGOP says:

    Unknown loser gloms on to flailing Democrat election year ploy.

    So ballsy! His chances against Balmer just went from 0% to 0.00001%.

    And I’m being generous. What a lame story.

  2. ArapaGOP says:


    Nearly two weeks after Palacio called for Gessler’s head there seems to be little to no movement on the recall effort, effectively exposing Palacio’s idle threat and calling into question his credibility.

    If there had been a groundswell of support to chuck Gessler, Democrats would be damn sure to highlight that fact.

    So far…nothing.

  3. This is blatantly unconstitutional.

    I can only hope that Gessler winds up with so many of these types of rules before the courts that the courts start sanctioning him or at least writing opinions that are scathing in their review of his actions.

  4. Pam Bennett says:

    Considering the voters have sent Balmer to the Golden Dome while supposedly knowing his familial and political history in a distant locale, it is doubtful they will notice this legal battle outcome. Or rather they will not care.

  5. DaftPunk says:

    This is a reprint of a press-release.

    It’s more of an open thread comment than a diary, let alone worthy of front-paging.

    Meta-critique complete, bring on the flames.  

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.