In a long-forgotten tape from the 2002 Massachusetts governor’s race obtained by ABC News, Mitt Romney is seen touting his Washington connections and his ability to get millions of taxpayer dollars from the federal government.
“I am big believer in getting money where the money is,” Romney says on the video, “The money is in Washington.”
The video, which was surreptitiously shot by Democratic opponents of Romney on Oct. 16, 2002, shows him addressing a group called the New Bedford Industrial Foundation. The Power Point presentation he uses lists ways to improve economic development in Massachusetts, including “boost federal involvement.”
“I want to go after every grant, every project, every department in Washington to assure that we are taking advantage of economic development opportunities,” Romney tells the group.
Very odd, as we thought this was the sort of thing Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum, those bad guy Washington insiders, would say. But their job was to approve these requests, so that’s worse? Perhaps Mitt Romney wishes the members of Congress he “went after” had said no?
The fact is, our biggest problem could be trying to make sense of this at all. The Friday before Super Tuesday may just not be the right time to ask.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Thanksgiving Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I often wonder why Colorado Pols only quotes certain parts of a story and not others:
That’s why – you’d have no story!
It’s a familiar refrain from R-money: Pay no attention to what I’ve said or done in the past. Only listen to what I say now.
When he was MA guv, he used his connections to get earmarks.
When he ran the Olympics, he used his connections to get earmarks.
Now he’s running for President and now he’s against earmarks.
That guy will say anything to get elected.
If only Mitt Romney weren’t the most brazen flip-flopper in the history of presidential politics.
Are you getting hazard pay for your attempts at spin control, Arap? You’re at serious risk of whiplash, and it’s only March!
The Mitt Romney saga would be much more interesting if people covered BOTH tongues that he speaks with.
Both positions in one day.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50…
You’re making Arap work overtime, and on a weekend. Have you no shame?
the question was a compound question and was confusing IMO
If you’re a Governor and there are grants and federal money available for you to better your state, why wouldn’t you try to get it?
you would sell off all the assets of your state and privatize all levels of state government to achieve a conservative utopia the old fashioned way.
Taking earmarks of any kind at any level is a sure sign of the devil’s work.
Cuz that’s what they really are.
You’re right. I thought the GOP still believed that states should wield more power than the federal government. I forgot that every level of government is bad.
But equally fair if you’re a U.S. Senator. Romney is dinging Santorum for doing the same thing.