Sorry Heidi: There Is No GOP “Leading Candidate” For Governor

An announcement from Colorado Republican gubernatorial candidate Heidi Ganahl about a “gubernatorial forum” tonight in Colorado Springs struck us with its newly-added presumptuous tagline:

As you can see, Ganahl is now billing herself as the “leading Republican candidate for governor.” In the advertising world, “leading,” like “best-selling,” is a claim you’re supposed to be able to justify with hard metrics–otherwise it’s better to go with more vague superlatives like “fastest-growing” that don’t necessary imply they are actually, you know, #1.

Not to mention the age-old saying: “if you have to say you are, you aren’t.”

But that got us thinking in all fairness: what’s the metric by which Heidi Ganahl could plausibly justify calling herself the “leading candidate?” There’s only one head-to-head matchup poll that’s been done pitting Ganahl and her upstart Republican opponent Danielle Neuschwanger against incumbent Gov. Jared Polis, and in that poll Neuschwanger performed better against Polis than Ganahl.

At last week’s candidate forum in DougCo, Ganahl reacted poorly to this being pointed out:

Would the metric Heidi is relying on be fundraising, then? Ganahl has technically raised the most of the Republican primary pack, but by any objective scale her fundraising has been extremely anemic compared to other Republican primary candidates in Colorado running for U.S. Senate and even congressional races. Ganahl certainly hasn’t demonstrated the fundraising ability to distinguish herself beyond the resources any Republican nominee could reasonably expect to start flowing after the primary.

So if it’s not polling and not fundraising, which most people would call the two most important benchmarks, where else can Ganahl point to justify her claim to be the “leading candidate for governor?” It’s not social media footprint either. Danielle Neuschwanger has well over twice the number of Twitter followers as Ganahl. Then we went over to Ganahl’s Youtube page to see how her overproduced campaign videos are going over:

We’re sorry to report that virality…has not been achieved! After a months-long controversial “podcast tour” to pre-launch her campaign and months since then on the trial, Ganahl has by no metric we can identify emerged as the “leading candidate,” or even minimally caught on as a contender in the race. That reflects a massive amount of wasted time and effort trying to build Ganahl’s name ID over the past year, results that Neuschwanger can undo with a few Lauren Boebert-style potshots.

Then just yesterday, the latest sign of “strength” came via the Colorado Sun’s Sandra Fish, reporting that Ganahl has turned in a perilously narrow margin of petition signatures, and as a result will be participating in the GOP’s state assembly next month as insurance for even making the primary ballot:

Ganahl claims to have performed some kind of secondary vetting of her collected signatures, but that’s still a far smaller margin than U.S. Senate candidate Joe O’Dea afforded himself by turning in over 23,000 voter signatures to validate. Would you call a candidate who fails to collect enough signatures after taking that route to qualify for the ballot and then has to play catch-up at assembly a “leading candidate?”

The increasingly undeniable truth is that Ganahl’s unexpected but profound weakness as a candidate has created a genuine opening for the relatively unknown Danielle Neuschwanger, and Ganahl is going to have to struggle all the way to June 28th for this nomination. We do expect that if Ganahl is forced to face off against Neuschwanger at the GOP state assembly she’ll get the required 30% to stay in the race–but there’s also a decent chance that Neuschwanger will beat Ganahl at the assembly. It will be even nore difficult to call Ganahl the “leading candidate” with a straight face after that.

In the event, just remember as usual that we said so.

10 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS says:

    You know, given the acumen of the typical Republican primary voter, encouraging these two to get into a nasty cat fight might be a sound strategy for improving interest and turnout in the GOP primary race.

     

  2. Conserv. Head Banger says:

    Ganahl is a leading Republican candidate for governor.

    She simply chooses to “lead” from the rear of the pack.

     

  3. NOV GOP meltdown says:

    Look right below the " free to the public " line.

    Presnted by !  who, the Weeknd ?

    Hiedi, Hiedi, Hiedi…

  4. JohnInDenver says:

    Can one have a "Gubernatorial Forum" with only one Gubernor candidate?

    And I find it interesting that a quick Google search turns up precisely NO mention of the event associated with "El Paso County Republican Women" or "Colorado Springs" "College Republicans." So, no doubt it will be hugely attended.

    • JohnInDenver says:

      Ah, looking for OTHER descriptors, I find this is a "2022 Republican gubernatorial debate live starting at 6 p.m. tonight"

      I continue to shake my head at the abuse of the word "debate." 

      Nonetheless, I am hoping some other person has been watching and will cover the event, emphasizing if anyone learned something from earlier debates and is "debating" in a manner to appeal to party participants for the Assembly or trying to already appeal for votes at the end-of-June primary.

       

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.