Pam Anderson is No Tina Peters, Which Cuts Both Ways

“Peters has proven herself, with both her actions and her support of extremists, to be wholly unworthy of public trust and public office.”

     — The Denver Post (2/15/22)

Embattled Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters announced on Monday that she is running for the Republican nomination for Secretary of State rather than seeking re-election in 2022.

On Tuesday, the editorial board of The Denver Post responded with a nearly-1,000 word blasting that could be summed up in two words: “HELL NAW.”

We should not be laughing at Tina Peters.

Yes, it’s hard. She was caught on video attempting to kick a police officer in a downtown Grand Junction bagel shop just days before she announced a run for secretary of state.

But Tina Peters is not funny. She’s dangerous.

Peters is part of a growing base of radicalized individuals attempting to undermine America’s democracy, tear apart our republic and destabilize our local, state, and federal governments. She attended a public event on Thursday night in Castle Rock where 9News reporter Marshall Zelinger captured on video an election conspiracy theorist making a direct threat to the current Colorado secretary of state – Peters’ opponent should she win the Republican nomination.

Tina Peters

We’ll quibble with one small part of this intro: We absolutely should be laughing at Tina Peters…just maybe in more of a nervous chuckle sort of way.

It is, of course, completely absurd that someone who is under investigation — by everyone from the local District Attorney to the FBI — for breaking into Mesa County’s election computers could possibly argue that they should be put in charge of elections for the entire State of Colorado. It is equally ridiculous that the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate could be a guy in Ron Hanks who says openly that Donald Trump was the real winner of the 2020 Presidential election, but here we are.

The less-crazy wing of the Colorado Republican Party is trying to promote former Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder Pam Anderson as a rational alternative to incumbent Democrat Jena Griswold.

For her part, Anderson tried on Monday to make the argument that she should be trusted with the GOP nomination instead of Peters:

Anderson makes some valid arguments, but there may not be enough moderate Republicans left in Colorado who are willing to listen. Even if there were, it’s not at all clear that Anderson will be able to reach them before the June Primary Election.

When Peters announced her run for SOS on Monday, it was a national story picked up by the likes of CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, NBC News, and many others. When Anderson took to Twitter for her response, she was met with this:

Ooof. Tina Peters makes national headlines by being Tina Peters. Local reporters, meanwhile, don’t even know how to reach Pam Anderson, which is not a good sign for her fledgling campaign.

For years, Republicans tried to convince Anderson to take a shot at higher office to no avail. Anderson may have picked the wrong year, and the wrong political party, in which to finally make that leap.

7 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. Meiner49er says:

    "Tina Peters makes national headlines by being Tina Peters. Local reporters, meanwhile, don’t even know how to reach Pam Anderson,"

    A perfect summary of the Warholian politics that curse our times. Nice one, Pols!

  2. davebarnes says:

    Is Anderson saying Wane Williams and Jena Griswold contributed to”hyper-partisanship and drama…over the past few years.”?

    Is Anderson saying Williams and Griswold were  inexperienced and irresponsible politicians in pursuit of divisive and partisan ideological agendas.”?

    • notaskinnycook says:

      She's a Republican. Of course she's going to say things like that It's her only chance against Griswold, who ran a flawless election in 2020 despite the best efforts of the MAGAts  

    • JohnInDenver says:

      Thank you, Charles.  I've been learning from and enjoying your coverage of Peters

      The link you provide goes to "Peters jumps into secretary of state race" — but doesn't really include much of anything on Pam Anderson.

      A quick look found a webpage with Facebook, Instagram and Twitter links.  I have to say … a Facebook account with a pinned post from November at the top, with 4 comments — ALL backing Peters or the Big Lie — didn't strike me as the best campaign communication.

      • Charles Ashby says:

        This is in the story:

        In a recent visit to Grand Junction, Anderson said that while she agrees with the actions that Griswold has taken to remove Peters as the county’s designated election official, she would have done it differently.

        “Coloradans continue to see what happens when these important positions are held by inexperienced and irresponsible politicians in pursuit of divisive and partisan ideological agendas,” Anderson said in a statement. “This office should be filled by trusted and proven professionals, not by politicians only interested in using it as a political football. I will be a fair referee, not fuel the fire of mistrust.”

  3. kwtree says:

    Tina’s mental state is not good: Anne Landman

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.