“He that will be angry for anything will be angry for nothing.”
–Sallust
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: joe_burly
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Thorntonite
IN: The Republican Field for Congress in CO-08
BY: bullshit!
IN: Speaker Johnson Frowns On Dave Williams’ Primary Chicanery
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
This is what we can look forward to from the Obama camp as long as Newt remains the front-runner: http://2012.talkingpointsmemo….
I would think Gingrich is the monkey and his butt represents the bad things about him.
If Gingrich is elected president, will we have been Newtered?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50…
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/S…
http://feministing.com/2011/12…
The Next Roe v. Wade?: Jennie McCormack’s Abortion Battle
U.S. to Aid Gay Rights Abroad, Obama and Clinton Say
Why has this been so under the radar? You’d think the religious nutters in the GOP would be all over this instead of forwarding chain emails about the White House “holiday” tree.
new from Gringrichco (a subsidiary of GOPco).
Know some poor kids? What better gift can you give the child that has nothing than the gift of a brighter future?
My Cleaning Trolley (Girls Only) . . .
. . . because at Gingrichco (a subsidiary of GOPco), we believe the solutions to America’s biggest problems are our little ones.
My Cleaning Trolley (Girls only) is for girls only. You’re don’t want to become a housekeeper — do you — little boy?
Ho Ho Ho — what’s that? A tear? You better not pout and you better not cry, . . . because if you do the good folks who bring toys to your homeless shelter might not get you the very latest from Gingrichco (a subsidiary of GOPco) — a very special something we designed just for poor little boys like you . . . the Henry Cleaning Trolley — Big Guy Janitor Edition.
Now all you poor kids, girls and boys, have some early job training tools that you can all be thankful for this Christmas.
So, . . . what are you waiting for, kid? . . . get to work.
Which do you figure? The reason he gives?
or… only two candidates, one a total no-hoper, would touch it.
And yeah I’m sure the GOP is real concerned about the whether or not the Donald wants to be their candidate. Insert eye roll here.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…
World to the Donald. It’s over. Your fired. Don’t count on your TV show lasting much longer either. You just might have to go to work for a living. And no, nobody believes your a real billionaire.
Looks like Colorado may have a new resident this spring – Rod Blagojevich may be coming to Littleton to serve his Federal prison sentence.
low security prison beds are a fucking valuable thing, you just don’t give them away for nothing…
how that area could be called “Littleton” or “Englewood” (which is what I think it actually says on its sign – I’ll have to take a closer look next time I drive by). It’s Lakewood if it’s anywhere.
Article says it’s in Littleton, though.
They got that straight from the BOP’s website, as well as the “15 miles SW of Denver” line, even though the city limits come within a mile of the place.
I guess it doesn’t really matter. If everything south of that is called “Littleton,” if only because the Post Office insists on giving it that designation (even the part that’s Denver), why not?
US calls for ban on in-car phone use … even with Bluetooth
http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_n…
OK, snark aside and recognizing the terrible injuries that this has contributed to (including recently one of our own Polsters), this really doesn’t seem to be a issue that’s going to win the current Administration overwhelming good will and warm the hearts of most voters; it plays right into the GOP narrative of too much government regulation (ala dust regulation on farms) and nanny-state intrusion in the personal lives and livelihoods of citizens. Americans may often ignore the interests of their own pocketbooks when voting, but my guess is they won’t vote against the interests of their precious, precious, precious cell phones.
Please don’t get me wrong here. I’m not saying this isn’t a problem that needs addressing in some fashion; I am saying that politically this ban recommendation is a loser. Or, am I just an insensitive and out-of-touch Neanderthal?
And if the only thing that matters is getting elected, then what benefit do we gain from winning an election?
I’d like to back you down a wee bit from your absolutist interpretation of what I wrote, unless you happen to actually know anyone who said, or believes, that the only thing that matters is getting elected.
(OK, hell, I’ll give you the one — thankfully there is only one Willard out there — anyone else?)
By “It’s”, are you contending that any and all manners of cell phone use are as impairing as driving drunk?
Given that cell phones are the latest and probably the most ubiquitous of current driving distractions, does the use of other electronics (CB radios, audio devices, etc.) and the plethora of other distractions vying for the attention (billboards, screaming children, dancing sign spinners, waving politicians) of today’s drivers all fall below that .08% intoxication threshold?
do you see this a political winner or loser? And, if it is a loser, is it a loser worth fighting the battle and taking the political hit anyway, because it’s the right thing to proceed?
Hands-free phone use is reasonably safe – at least it should be as safe as talking to a passenger. The “ban them all” approach is overkill.
A hands free phone conversation vs. texting while driving is no comparison. Why don’t they have any common sense and just ban texting while driving ? Really stupid decision.
so if I am driving drunk I can call a cab to take me the rest of the way after I wreck
that places with texting bans have people who still do it, but on the down low.
Someone on FB quoted a police friend of theirs who allegedly posted a rant about the unenforceability* of bans. People tend to put the phones well out of sight if cops are around.
Something I’ve seen alleged on the web is that cell phone companies can track who might be driving (based on how quickly the user’s motion is making their signal transfer from one tower to the next) and could put the phones in a kind of silent mode when that happens, sending phone calls straight to voice mail and temporarily disabling texting. If true, it sounds like it would be a pain for passengers who would be unfairly shut down, but something along those lines might be the best solution.
* sorry for the made-up word, if it hurts your eyes to read it.