We noted on Tuesday that GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney will attend a fundraiser in Denver next week, co-hosted by much of the top-level Colorado Republican brass. Their support stands in contrast to polling that shows Romney is rapidly losing ground in this state to Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who was in Aspen recently collecting big checks at a fundraiser featuring former gubernatorial primary candidates Marc Holtzman and Scott McInnis.
As our friends at the Washington Post report, the “Tea Party” is in the process of making their choice for President too–but for now, their view seems to be “anybody but Romney.”
Romney, despite his slip from frontrunner status since Texas Gov. Rick Perry entered the GOP race, remains a formidable candidate with the most money and the deepest organization and fundraising network of anyone in the field. His weaknesses among conservatives – most notably his support for a health-care overhaul in Massachusetts that became the basis for Obama’s health care plan – are overlooked in favor of his business acumen and moderation on social issues by those who view electability over Obama is paramount.
That hasn’t stopped some tea party leaders from launching an anyone-but-Romney campaign that will include protesting during his appearances at conservative functions and working to counter his organization in crucial states, [Pols emphasis] such as Florida and Ohio, that come after the earliest primaries next year. The idea is to establish a broader narrative that Romney is unacceptable. The risk, if they fail, is that they undermine the political influence that the movement has worked tirelessly for two years to build.
Matt Kibbe, president of the national organization FreedomWorks, said it’s a risk worth taking.
“I think the message from the tea party in New Hampshire is, “We’re not useful idiots,'” Kibbe said, repeating a phrase that has popped up increasingly in recent days to remind activists not to capitulate to the Republican establishment. “There’s this long tradition in the Republican Party to simply elect the next guy in line. That’s how we got John McCain, and that’s how we got Mitt Romney. If somebody says that early and often, you have a better potential to see if somebody can emerge as a true competitor to Romney.”
It’s instructive to remember: FreedomWorks is the same organization that emerged as an early backer of Weld County DA Ken Buck in the 2010 GOP Senate primary against the “establishment” candidate, former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton. Buck’s strong support from the “Tea Party” against Norton was instrumental in his razor-thin primary victory last year.
Most of the Colorado GOP establishment last year backed Jane Norton. As it turns out, they were wise to do so–given Buck’s massive loss to Michael Bennet with women, but very narrow loss overall…we aren’t saying with 100% certainty that Norton would be Senator Norton today had she won the primary, but it’s very clear in hindsight who the more electable candidate was.
And now FreedomWorks has a new “establishment favorite” to bust down the way they busted down Jane Norton–with or without the permission of local GOP bigwigs. Mitt Romney.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: psyclone
IN: BREAKING: Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Gets 9 Years
BY: Genghis
IN: I’m Gabe Evans, and This is the Worst Ad You’ve Seen in Years
BY: kwtree
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Republican 36
IN: I’m Gabe Evans, and This is the Worst Ad You’ve Seen in Years
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: BREAKING: Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Gets 9 Years
BY: spaceman2021
IN: BREAKING: Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Gets 9 Years
BY: spaceman2021
IN: BREAKING: Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters Gets 9 Years
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Friday Jams Fest
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Didn’t Tom back Romney last cycle?
Personally I’m undecided, but then again it doesn’t matter because I’m forbidden from voting in GOP or Dem primaries.
One vote you can count on though is my vote for the GOP nominee.*
*unless it’s Dan Maes
Why not be one? Or is it that you’ve been thrown out of too many caucuses for being a lunatic?
I’m guessing he’ll be eligible in 2016.
Anybody with Libby’s years-long devotion to the cause of trolling has adult patience. I’ve always thought of Libertad as a 70+ Social Security and Medicare recipient with neighborhood kids who won’t get off his lawn. So he comes here to be bitter about it.
Your theory is as good as mine, though.
personhood upon spambots.
really is. In 2008 the Rush Limbaugh fringe that went on to morph into the movement collectively referred to as the Tea Party wanted practically anybody but McCain but the establishment prevailed and even Rush went along in the end. TP was strong enough to force some unelectable’s through GOP primaries in 2010 and to win victories in power struggles with Speaker Boehner in 2011. So if they manage to block Romney in favor of Perry or someone equally outside the mainstream , guess it all over for the old GOP. If Romney or someone more Romneyish triumphs, it will prove those tough, wily old establishment types can’t be written off yet.
I’m not feeling inclined to place any bets in the crazy new GO(T)P world we’re living in now.
in the Republican Party to simply elect the next guy in line. That’s how we got John McCain, and that’s how we got Mitt Romney.”
That’s also how we got Ronald Reagan. That line of reasoning makes him look like an “idiot.”
Furthermore, why do these guys think that many others think it’s Romney’s ‘turn’ anyway? Because he ran once before and lost in the primary? Because he’s a Mormon ex-Gov of a blue state?
These guys want to take the same strategy that worked so well for them in DE, NV & CO and transfer it to the presidential. Amazing.
Obama’s had a rough month, but the troubles on your side haven’t exactly gone away.