“The wise skeptic does not teach doubt, but how to look for the permanent in the mutable and fleeting.”
–Ralph Waldo Emerson
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: kwtree
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Thorntonite
IN: Jeff Hurd Exercises Cave-In Option On Medicaid Cuts
BY: kwtree
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Jeff Hurd Exercises Cave-In Option On Medicaid Cuts
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
“Intolerance of ambiguity is the mark of an authoritarian personality.”
Theodor W. Adorno
Emerson is addressing the unchanging values like those found in the area of moral philosophy, i.e., ethics for instance. Adorno is simply stating how thuggery views issues.
“You’re either with us or your against us?” as an answer to anyone who questioned the wisdom of invading Iraq as a response to 9/11 that made absolutely no sense, leading to the idiocy of things like “freedom fries”?
You mean like “America. Love it or leave it” as a response to anyone who opposes any American government’s foreign policy decisions? The entire black and white, good an evil, the US can never be even partly in the wrong because we’re number one world of the Bush II era?
I’ll give Rs credit for tolerating a very sophisticated level of ambiguousness in some areas. Like the way they’ve never had any trouble claiming to be the patriotic supporters the troops while shooting down all Dem legislation to provide more funding for our troops and vets while fighting tooth and nail for tax breaks for the rich and subsidies for corporations that never seem to prouduce those promised jobs. Claiming to be all about small government while they always support huge government tax payer financed welfare for the rich. Stuff like that.
I think one thing that’s clear from his poor handling of this unfortunate situation:
Weiner needs a handler.
Someone who can really straighten the situation out.
Someone who can answer the media’s pointed questions.
Someone….
Ok, ok. I couldn’t help myself.
They could even be left-leaning.
He’s totally getting shafted.
Or, maybe the Newter.
Not for myself. Reedy city boy, nah. But I have a friend who’d like to send in her resume.
The I’d say he’s been packaging it rather well himself…
“You know this is part of the problem with the way in which this has progressed and one of the reasons that I was, perhaps — you’ll forgive me — a little bit stiff yesterday….”
“Maybe if my name was hamburger the picture would have been of something else.”
On what happened to his Twitter/yfrog account: “Maybe this is the tip of al-Qaeda’s sword.”
COme on, PR. A handler. A Weiner handler. Get it?
And if you think he’s handling this well by any stretch of the imagination, then maybe you’re the blind partisan, not me. This thing would have already gone away if he hadn’t been evasive, snippy, and overly defensive about it, and not forthcoming at all.
Those were his quotes, from yesterday.
If it’s quips and puns you think he needs, he’s got the stuff and is showing it off.
As to the more serious question, no, I don’t think he’s handling this well. A blunt admission “yep, it’s my junk – my wife took that shot last week and someone hacked into my account and posted it” would be better than the “it doesn’t look familiar, but I can’t say with certitude that it’s not me” – that’s too lawyerly for the general public.
was either taken by or sent to the wife. Or at least if she’s willing to stand by smiling while you say so.
.
a stalker did this:
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com…
.
Are you related to ellbee JOHNSON?
about ellbee’s johnson. Weiner’s weiner is bad enough.
Proof that the 2012 GOP field is truely the Cream of the Crap…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…
Maybe I need to reconsider my decision not to run
The B says it’s in the bag, no matter who gets nominated.
in a Minnesota poll
http://publicpolicypolling.blo…
Do we have Dyer’s permission not to be terrified of the Bachmann now? Without being accused of being a bunch of liberal chuckleheads?
Someone (perhaps even me) has published a diary on Rocky Mountain National Park over at that orange place…
Where would one go to satisfy that urge? Particularly, if one were fond of cute marmots?
If anyone else wants the URL without forcing our dear Phoenix Rising to provide it himself, email me.
Takes a couple of clicks, even…
And thanks for that particular interest. Photos on my site are behind the times – I’ll be updating them tonight or tomorrow in preparation for a gallery display I’ll be part of that opens over the weekend.
Meaning there are personages who might be unable to figure it out on their own 😉
Also, for the social media junkies like me, you might want to add the link to the flickr pages for the photos–it took me a minute to remember that just because the website isn’t attached to the flickr doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. I’m so millennial sometimes.
But yeah, baby marmot photo from Flickr on the website plz?
Thanks for sharing.
and I don’t mean a “pretty” graphic.
http://www.scienceprogress.org…
It’s not like real people live in coastal areas and are going to be innundated by rising sea levels.
ANd even if they are- they should just move.
The melting of sea ice doesn’t raise sea level. Try this experiment: Make yourself a gin-and-tonic with lots of ice. Fill it to the top. Let the ice melt. Watch to see if the cup runneth over. Still skeptical? Repeat as required until you’re convinced.
Sea level will rise when ice on land (Greenland and/or Antarctica) melts and runs into the sea. That’ll happen, too, but probably not as quickly.
.
obvious, maybe.
but I hadn’t thought of it.
.
By the percentage of the iceberg that is above the surface. Ice is denser than water. But you are correct, icebergs melting will have a minimal effect.
If ice were denser than water, it would sink.
The ice cube weighs as much as the volume of seawater displaced by the ice cube. When the ice melts it occupies essentially the same volume as the ice cube displaced.
There is however, a very small effect due to the fact that sea ice is less salty than sea water (as sea ice freezes, much of the salt is expelled).
Sorrt, got it backwards – it’s less dense. But even fresh water when freezing expands a bit – put a glass of water in the freezer and you’ll see. (Put it in a baggie so you don’t get broken glass in your freezer.)
Sea ice is frozen sea water.
When sea water freezes, the ice is less dense than sea water (due to its crystal structure), and hence floats. When it thaws, it merely returns to its liquid state. So we can see that on a year-to-year basis, seasonal sea ice doesn’t contribute to sea level rise.
What about old, multi-year ice?
If I have a glass of water and add ice cubes (fresh water, fresh water ice), then mark the level on the side of the glass, when the ice melts, the water level will be unchanged.
If I do the same thing with freshwater ice cubes in a glass of sea ice, when the ice melts the level will go up a very, very small amount, because the freshwater from the melted ice is less dense than the sea water.
as most sciencey sounding.
Don’t you have to be able to duplicate it to make it accepted? I think so. Get started, Pol fact checkers!
Let’s all see how many times we can duplicate the results. For science.
🙂
http://www.physorg.com/news561…
Also: floating ice has higher libido (I know there’s an Anthony Weiner joke here somewhere) than open water. So there’s a positive feedback that less light is reflected into space.
Also: Ice melts in part because the water below it is warming. Warmer water takes up more space than cooler water, an effect sometimes spoken of with the term ‘expanding water column’ and the effect is nontrivial. (I wrote that myself. Do I win a prize for most sciency?)
Tomato, French Tickler.
You win the Steeley Dan award for melty science.
I’m surrounded by Mr. Wizard clones. If you’re too young to remember him, ask an aging boomer.
And in a bigger picture it goes away entirely.
As in:
Sea ice is frozen sea water. Thus, if we take a glass of sea water and partially freeze it, and then let it thaw, in the end we have exactly the same volume.
Because sea ice is in constant motion, even old sea ice isn’t really ancient. Most multi-year ice is on the order of a decade old.
Beyond the fact that explorers and researchers describe current ice quality as “rotten”, as we lose the “refrigerator at the top of the world”, climate changes are expected to start accelerating exponentially. It is postulated that the energy that had gone into converting water from solid to liquid state, will instead just heat up the water and air. There will be much more evaporation and weather patterns will shift accordingly.
The heated water will accelerate the dissolving of sea bed methane hydrates in the geographically large and shallow East Siberian Arctic Shelf, and since these now form a cap over vast reservoirs of free methane, we will probably see significant increases of methane in the atmosphere.
These intricately connected natural systems will start to behave in strange ways. Have your camera ready.
that Dems have a very, very good chance of retaking the House, and that Medicare is absolutely NOT on the budget cutting table.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics…
You havn’t heard? The tea party is over.
The human punching bag.
I don’t read republican blogs, watch fox tv or listen to right-wing shock jocks.
http://www.denvergov.org/elect…
.
4 a city w/ a population of around 100,000, for Denver voters to cast 56,000 ballots shows a pretty good percentage actively engaged in the process.
.
560,578 have been returned. We take our democracy very seriously here. Vote early, vote often. I’ve got 200 more of my bad boys ready to go. Don’t know why I wrote in something different every time… Oh well, off to the voting center!
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011…
However, Ranger’s lead the way!
http://www.stripes.com/news/ar…
http://completecolorado.com/st…
I’m sorry, but all that proves is that Evan is a total douche (like we need any more proof). The biggest question would obviously be why the FBI didn’t pursue an investigation? It’s such a clever pseudonym!
Anyway, the last set of four numbers in the blacked out section doesn’t start with a 6. It’s a 4. So much for documentation of the clever phone number. Although it does seem completely plausible that no one bothered to read all the way to the end of the long list since 2008. President of the City Council is so fucking obscure. How would any law enforcement or reporters know? Good job, Lassie! Now go find a kid in a well, or run off to lick yourself. Something’s gotta be more worthwhile than this.
is just dying to be part of that libel suit.
Or to be part of getting a different Democrat elected.
God bless him.
the flacid Auk of the Acopalypse shows us his junk.
It’s over. Romer will be the next mayor.
because I like to be clear, Sheperd called the number himself and then blacked out the last four digits, in spite of linking to a document where it’s clearly listed. That right?
Common sense is so fun! The first number of the last four digits is a 4, not a 6. See, numbers look all different and shit. What we type to represent them all looks the same. Otherwise we wouldn’t have numbers, or words. Uniformity is why you can read this. 6 doesn’t have an elbow on the left, only 4 does.
Tell Sheperd I said more cowbell and Sharpie. FWIW, I hope you’re right about the race, but it won’t be because you guys are making shit up. Is there even a reason to make up bad things about either candidate? Believe me, there’s plenty to go around, no Sharpies needed.
I haven’t seen anyone mention this piece of urban mythology, so who better to post it?
The Onion’s “Abortionplex” gets reviewed on Yelp
Inevitably leading to:
10 Funniest Yelp Reviews of Kansas’ Abortionplex.
My fave:
I fear for the day when so many people fail to get the concept of satire that it has to be banned for fear of a majority believing it…
And on that note, I offer this: