U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser

60%↑

50%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) David Seligman

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) J. Danielson

(R) Sheri Davis
50%

40%

30%
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(D) Jeff Bridges

(R) Kevin Grantham

40%

40%

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Trisha Calvarese

(D) Eileen Laubacher

90%

20%

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Manny Rutinel

(D) Yadira Caraveo

45%↓

40%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 13, 2011 08:46 PM UTC

Sen. Kohl to Retire; Now 8 Open Senate Seats in 2012

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We’ve gotten used to regular, competitive elections for U.S. Senate in Colorado; because of retirements and appointments in the last decade, we had a remarkable eight different General Election candidates from 2002-2010.

Sadly for political junkies, Colorado will not have an election for U.S. Senate in 2012, so we’ll have to live vicariously through other states in the meantime. Today Wisconsin Sen. Herb Kohl announced that he will retire rather than run for re-election in 2012, which creates yet another open seat. As our friends at “The Fix” explain:

Kohl is the sixth Democratic-aligned Senator to step aside in advance of the 2012 election. Two Republicans aren’t running for reelection next year.

Democratic strategists insisted that they will field a top-tier candidate in the open seat, noting that the fight between Gov. Scott Walker (R) and national unions over collective bargaining in the state earlier this year has energized the party.

Reps. Ron Kind, Tammy Baldwin and Steve Kagen as well as former Sen. Russ Feingold and former Rep. Tom Barrett, who ran lost to Walker last November, are mentioned.

National Republican Senatorial Committee spokesman Brian Walsh said in a statement that Kohl’s retirement “immediately presents another key opportunity for Senate Republicans next year.”

For Republicans, the obvious name is Rep. Paul Ryan, the architect of House Republicans’ controversial budget plan. It’s not clear whether Ryan wants to leave his perch as chairman of the House Budget Commtitee to make a statewide run, however.

Democrats currently hold a 4-vote margin in the Senate, but they have the most seats to defend in 2012 (21 Democrats end their terms in 2013, compared to 10 Republicans).

Comments

5 thoughts on “Sen. Kohl to Retire; Now 8 Open Senate Seats in 2012

  1. Republicans won’t take the seat in a year Obama is on the ballot, and Scott Walker still in charge. Walker gave the Democrats of Wisconsin a 10-year pass.

    Many swing voters in Wisconsin are progressive-leaning due to their state’s history and canonization of La Follette. They are more moderate and not driven by religion or libertarianism. The Medicare busting of Paul, and the union busting of Walker give most independents enough pause to pull the lever for any competent Democrat.  

    1. but I know nothing about Wisconsin politics; certainly his name recognition is higher than any other potential candidate.  Is there anyone else out there with enough positives to be a better choice anyway?

      1. He leads the field in some theoretical polling that was done a short while back, performing better than other (D) candidates.  But he’s also not a huge money-raiser and doesn’t really like outside money coming in, so he puts himself at unnecessary disadvantage in campaigns.

  2. He’s got a virtual monopoly (written into the rules) on budget bills; being Senator, even in a theoretical majority, would lose him that.

    Only two possibilities change that math…

    1) it looks like the House is going to switch control, in which case Ryan is likely in trouble anyway because he’ll be largely to blame for the losses.

    2) it looks like Republicans will take the Presidency and retain the House, but need a stronger candidate in Wisconsin to have a good shot at the Senate.  I think Ryan’s enough of an ideologue that he’d make the switch if it meant full GOP control of government – the goal is more important than the post.  But Ryan isn’t a strong enough candidate right now, and it’s not likely Wisconsin voters will be kind to him in an anti-GOP Wisconsin election cycle.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

120 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols