“I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence.”
–Frederick Douglass
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: bullshit!
IN: So-Called “Patriot Front,” Or Maybe Feds, March Through Downtown Denver
BY: joe_burly
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Who Will Win Colorado’s Tightest Congressional Races? (Poll #3)
BY: kwtree
IN: The Pro-Normal Party Coalition (feat. Adam Frisch)
BY: kwtree
IN: The Pro-Normal Party Coalition (feat. Adam Frisch)
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Who Will Win Colorado’s Tightest Congressional Races? (Poll #3)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
from San Francisco Magazine
from Metro.co.uk
from Orange News
Hopefully they practiced safe sex……
and rather apt considering some of the verbal disagreements I’ve had recently.
http://www.kdvr.com/news/sns-b…
Interesting article in Forbes the other day:
Blue Cross in Kansas City has 58% increase in the number of small businesses who have signed up with them. United Health Group added 75,000 new customers working in small businesses.
If you still are saying that the new health care law is death to small businesses … or it’s a job killer … or it’s socialistic … read this article.
http://blogs.forbes.com/rickun…
No Obama-lovers there. Thanks!
Those pesky facts again.
“I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence.”
Regarding the reading of the Constitution
at the US House of Representatives, there was this exchange:
So what are they deleting? References to slavery, womens right to vote and prohibition. Can these Republicans incur their own abhorrence by being untrue to the facts? Is their abhorrence reserved for the unpleasant truth?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…
On the one hand, the teabaggers are het up about the sanctity of the Constitution and how we need to hew more closely to the intent of our sacred and infallible founding fathers. On the other hand, they’re too embarrassed to read the parts of the Constitution that are clearly, flat-out, horribly wrong.
To me, reading the entire Constitution helps illuminate some important principles: That our founding fathers had to compromise in order to form this union; that our nation had the ability to recognize and right the wrongs that are in the Constitution; that times have changed and we have changed the Constitution to adapt to those changes; and that our nation cannot survive without readily available liquor.
In short, our Constitution is a living, breathing, changing document and its genius is that it can change with the times. That is why the Scalia-educated teabagger party wouldn’t allow it to be read in its entirety.
The more likely explanation is that no one in the majority wanted a 2-minute YouTube clip circulating of a Republican member reading one of the deleted passages.
The radio audience of about 30 million nationwide is mobilized to support the destruction of the 14th amendment because they have been indoctrinated.
Sputtering now has no impact.
Interesting column in the Washington Post by Steven Pearlstein:
WTF!?!
Could we please hold off on blaming anyone until we know what happened? Lots of prayers down to AZ.
.
Jared takes these kinds of risks all the time, ensuring that ordinary folks have access and a voice.
Should he stop ?
.
So do all the best who make themselves easily accessible to constituents Hard to see how they can stop and we can still have representative government.
at grocery stores.
We do not have a gun problem in this country (just ask the NRA). We do not have a problem with untreated mental illness in this country (just ask those who have been so willing to slash mental health treatment funding).
And it’s okay for a political PAC to use an image of gunsights to mark places on a map where there are Congress members whom that PAC “targeted” in 2010.
I’m really glad you brought it up.
Insurance companies cutting mental health, and employers accepting it for their employees, was one of the first really draconian measures that were taken so that the insuror could “rein in health care costs”. They limited numbers of counseling sessions, degraded the quality of those they would pay, minimized and eliminated inpatient treatment and so much more. I remember that when Reagan was shot and Hinckley’s illness came to light I really thought things might get better. Nope. Hinckley, fortunately for him, has been confined and treated at an inpatient facility since his trial. Prior to that his parents, from Evergreen, had almost impoverished themselves paying out of pocket because he was not insured. Family had made efforts.
Mark David Chapman. I am not aware that this poor soul ever received treatment. It should be obvious to all that he is 90% gnuts and 10% criminal (give or take). I would much prefer that he be in a proper facility though I loved John Lennon.
Governments offer little to nothing, the same is offered by insurors. The mentally ill get little in the way of empathy. They are usually referred to in other terms. Lazy. Homeless. (Obviously, all homeless are NOT mentally ill. But, many are.)
Our “treatment” of the mentally ill is one step better than 19th century asylums. I am perpetually ashamed of our country in this regard.
of buying insurance across state lines.
States can mandate that certain things are covered, which can make insurance more expensive (if the treatment costs more than the consequences of the condition going untreated.) Buying insurance across state lines allows you to buy the cheapest crappiest insurance you can find, while begging the question of who you appeal to when you have to fight with your crappy out of state insurer; Your state’s insurance commissioner who has no leverage, or the that of the state where you are not a citizen and don’t have standing.
.
http://www.juancole.com/2011/0…
Just like the way that American Christians put their lives in harm’s way to protect their Muslim neighbors.
.
Thanks for sharing, Barron.
.
not a lot of Christians that I know of have taken any risks for Muslim neighbors.
2 of my neighbors have told me that a Muslim can’t be a good American.
.
Thanks for the link. A very uplifting story.
Why do they believe that? Just ethnocentrism at play, or did they have anything at all more than that?
http://www.economist.com/node/…
I’ve mostly been watching the news on the shooting and the discussion about removing violence from our political rhetoric. But this caught my eye and I think it’s really important.
Call Time
.
how do you get away with that, David ?
.
Using the ages old “man in the middle” attack – from technology review
that the professional auto theft community already knew all of that.
Nice going, David!!!
🙂
Which either arbits poorly for Democrats, or rehashes the obvious. Republicans favor the government maintaining the status quo, and Democrats favor government helping those who have not benefited from the American Dream.
http://www.theatlantic.com/pol…
.
Colorado Congressman Reacts To Shooting
http://www.krdo.com/news/26418…
Uh, KRDO, Mr. Lamborn does not attend public events.
.
Glenn Reynolds has nailed it. Emphasis mine.
to be concerned about, or critical of, inflammatory rhetoric (on either or both sides of the political spectrum) — on the contrary it would be indecent not to.
You are free to question the timing or the motives, just as you are free to be wrong.
If you’re simply pulling it out of your ass to score points.
Someone I respect once responded to one of my posts that you’re “the best.” I don’t know you that well, I’m certain that is mutual.
That was intended to be the “Royal You”. Not you in particular. Sorry for not being more clear.
How come you didn’t bold that part?
I’ve exhausted my energy for the evening. Reading some of the posts about this horrible, horrible tragedy has been the most depressing thing I’ve ever seen here at Pols. Oh, well.
Now.
This was a man I was lucky enough to meet. The book was beautiful and the miniseries that Hanks and Spielberg put together was a work of art. I recommend it. Sweet journey, Dick Winters.