CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 26, 2010 07:38 PM UTC

Diaries of a Rubber Stamp #13

  • 32 Comments
  • by: bjwilson83

Apparently Rubberstamp Man is still doing his best to campaign for Bennet, in hopes that he will be able to rejoin him in Washington, D.C., just like the good old days.

How does his latest attempt at canvassing go? Well, Michael is nowhere to be found, as usual, and more people seem to be interested in RM himself rather than Michael Bennet.

Comments

32 thoughts on “Diaries of a Rubber Stamp #13

  1. I think it’s great that this guy can be so publicly shamed for dirty campaigning and yet, he’s undeterred. Go BJ go! You’re a shining example of everything that was once good, and can be again.

    1. As long as Bennet wants to run sleazy and despicable ads (not my words – that’s from fact checkers) in order to try to distract attention from his failed record, I will continue to point it out and turn the conversation back to what matters.

      1. use sleazy, despicable tactics on Facebook, we will continue to point it out and turn the conversation back to what matters–you being a douche.

          1. Yes, feel free to “bet” many of us have volunteered for a Dem campaign. Want to bet how many of us have created dishonest online profiles so as to publish comments misleadingly asserting we’re on the other side and won’t vote for the party candidate?

            We do volunteer; we’re just not volunteer pathological liars, creating whole false personalities, right down to listing favorite TV shows and friending >100 people, just to lie to people.

            But I’m sure Jesus loves you best, right? He doesn’t care if you’re a liar because you’re doing god’s righteous work by backing the gay-hater. Because Jesus was all about peddling hate and lies, right?

                1. I can’t comment on “Jack Lawrence” as I have never seen a registered polster using that name here. But the others aren’t “sockpuppets;” the term means a single user trying to disguise the fact the he’s just one person by having many different screen names, with the purpose of trying to make it look like his viewpoint is widely supported. What BSWilson83.83, Libertad2.0, et al, are doing is creating alter egos for the purpose of parodying you and Libertad. Their screen names ensure that we don’t mistake them for unique polsters, and they don’t go about having conversations with each other, trying to look like they’re several people representing a kind of bloc here.

                  There’s probably a word for these polsters but it’s not sockpuppet. (And please, it’s not “asshole” or some other butthurt insult you’re thinking.)

                  1. I don’t think Steve’s purpose was to appear to be many different people; his sockpuppets never talked to each other or came out all together on one thread to swarm some opponent. I really don’t know what he was up to, but it wasn’t a deceitful intent (other than, after his ban, his attempt to remain online here).

              1. By November 2nd, if you have enough intelligence to figure out who I am.

                Yesterday’s guesses weren’t even a good start . . . remember you’re so very much brighter than that.  Come on, any guy smart enough to create David Chestnut ought to be smart enough to figure this out.

                Any guesses for today, or are you just goint to give up and slink away quietly never to be heard of again after November 2nd?

                1. I’ve taken enough harassment, abuse, and threats to last a lifetime. However, it is a worthy sacrifice for my country. I will do my duty to continue to point out the hypocrisy and corruption of the left.

                  1. You LOVE the attention. Positive, negative, no matter – you thrive on it.

                    If you want to make a sacrifice for your country, you would have joined the armed forces. Hell, you were exactly the prime age for serving in Iraq, going after that yellow cake. But no, you’d rather harass a bunch of people online, with comments so inane that the other hard right trolls ignore you too. Some “sacrifice.”

                  2. smart enough or brave enough to even venture a guess,

                    and,

                    you lack the honor to keep the challenge you accepted?

                    Mama Chestnutz must be so very proud of you.

          2. What you did was an impersonation. My god, you are stupid.

            And you know what? i have volunteered for Dem campaigns, but I never posted fake Republican comments on Facebook–or this blog for that matter–under the guise of being a good Republican. Or at the very least, I never got caught red handed.

            Dumbass.

                1. to lecture me about sockpuppeting. I haven’t met an honest Dem yet on this site, except maybe David (although he’s a Republican in disguise). You’ll lie through your teeth all day long if it suits your ends-justify-the-means goal of world domination.

                  1. Oh yeah! My world domination scheme! And it would have worked if it wasn’t for you meddling teabaggers!

                    OMG. I’m laughing so hard….

                    Oh man. Over it now.

                    Hey, here’s a shout out to all the armchair psychologists on this site. Beej’s Narcissistic Personality Disorder is pretty easy to spot, but what do you make of his constant projection? Here’s the guy who posed as someone he wasn’t on Facebook in violation of their terms, saying others are liars. (And never admitting he lied himself by setting up that FB account.) Is that indicative of any other personality disorders?

                1. Scourge of Pols, why aren’t you banned like beej wants?? He once confused you with the real Libertad and is butthurt that he’s the only sucker who did that. What right have you to address the basement sockpuppet king that is beej?

                  1. Right now you are approaching Steve Harvey-esque levels of engaging BJ. Can we all just take this last week and not respond to anything he posts? He would go away very, very quickly.

                    I’m guilty of it myself, but I think if we all reached a mutual understanding, BJ would go back to trolling FB posts. If you keep rattling in the baby’s face, the baby will never take its nap. If you had the rattle, it loses interest very quickly.

      1. I didn’t realize this approval went through the other place.

        I thought they had to be approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and receive the blessing of the Executive Office of the President to fulfill NEPA review requirements.  Correct me if I’m wrong, please.

        If my understanding is correct, than what you are actually implying is that the USACE would take advice from Congress, regardless of impact and that President is not convinced, making this “rubber stamp” unsure, too.  Meaning that your dumbass joke is, well, dumb.  Least of all because yet another joke pointed toward the armed services in any way will just remind the vets here.  Good luck with that.

        OR you didn’t bother to research anything and instead picked a random bit of a debate to make some kind of faux point.  Sorry, not you so much as Buck’s campaign.  But research before statement has never been his strong point… according to you.  Funny how that works.

        Don’t worry, I’m not expecting an answer this time either…

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

224 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!