Back in early July we posted at Colorado Pols about a “cease and desist” letter that we received from an attorney representing The Denver Post and 16 Colorado newspapers. The letter demanded that Colorado Pols immediately stop “any and all unauthorized literal copying from our clients’ newspapers or websites.”
Though we didn’t believe the legal arguments to be particularly strong, we complied with this demand primarily because we knew that wouldn’t mean much at all to our readers and our traffic to just ignore the Post and those other news outlets. As we wrote on July 7:
One of the neat things about the Internet is that we don’t have to make assumptions here – we can actually show you whether or not referencing the Post is vital to our “business model.” In April 2010, the last full month that we referenced the Post or any of the outlets included in this letter, Colorado Pols generated 617,661 page views. If it were true that our very existence depended upon the Post and similar news outlets, it would stand to reason that our traffic would drop dramatically once we stopped talking about them, right?
We’ve told you what kind of traffic we received in April, and we’ll tell you what kind of traffic we have once the month of July is completed – an entire month of no references to the Post or others listed in the letter, from either us or others posting diaries or comments. We are fully confident that our traffic won’t decrease because we aren’t referencing the Post, because we know that our success has absolutely nothing to do with the Post, the Lamar Ledger, or any other news site. People come to Colorado Pols to read (wait for it) Colorado Pols. It’s not any more complicated than that.
So what happened? Exactly what we knew would happen: Not referencing the Post or these other newspapers has done absolutely nothing to hurt our readership:
COLORADO POLS TRAFFIC
April 2010: 617,661 page views
July 2010: 891,053 page views
Not only does Colorado Pols continue to thrive without content from the likes of The Denver Post, but we’re bigger than ever. In fact, at our rate of growth Colorado Pols should cross the “1 million page views per month” threshold before November.
So for all of the traditional news media executives and editors who believe that blogs like Colorado Pols only exist because of their reporting and writing…well, let’s just say you’re going to need to think up a new angle here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
we certainly will need your help in the general election for Hickenlooper and Romanoff.
Give us our 8 days. If Romanoff is the guy then great I will support him but we are still within margin of error and with 8 days to go. Don’t bank it yet.
Thanks for the great resource. I can honestly say I don’t read the DP daily but I do visit this site.
You break the news & all contributors (right2left & points in-between) benefit from the insider’s perspective and some genuine sane discourse on Colorado issues.
Thnx & keep it up!
visited the Denver Past in a long time. Congrats Pols, you sail a good ship here.
I am proud to be a small part of it.
The Daily Sentinel unlinked me from their main page a year ago March.
My daily visitor count is up more than 30 percent since then.
Papers? We don’t need no steenkin’ papers.
I appreciate it.
As a one man operation, I don’t do a links column (too much work to keep checking for bad ones) but if I did, you’d be on it.
I was hoping the new publisher would rescind Herzog’s thin skinned, petty dumping but alas Seaton still has some thin skinned reporters that can’t take the heat!!! Suffice it to say I don’t read the Sentinel’s blog entries unless someone points out a particular good one to me which is rare.
There are no local bloggers listed anymore.
Just Sentinel bloggers.
I am here all the time whether I comment or not.
I am curious though; do you have information on what you’re unique page views are? Is that something you could share?
Thanks for being a site that we can all enjoy.
I’m glad to be part of the community by sharing timely, thought provoking diaries.
If only.
Try to do “well written” instead of thought provoking. Just a suggestion.
not as impressive as the quality of the discourse. You’re obviously smart, and you’ve attracted a really smart bunch of people. (Some of they write real good, too.) Thanks for starting and running a top-knotch site.
Somehow we’ve got a strong community here and that is what makes this place the top spot for political news & commentary.
Also the place for the best candidate interviews 🙂
Since when does size matter?
I can think of many things where larger is better. POLS bigness though, that is a good question.
not the wand, or with fishing, the technique not the tool…
At least I tell myself that.
Congrats Pols…
I do wonder how many are Triguardian.
Not the size of the wave, but the motion of the ocean. Blah, blah, blah.
and yes it’s generally men who bring them up.
Hey, its no secret, the fragile male ego…
Here’s my particular favorite.
The Denver daily of record is pure and simple tabloid journalism and make no effort to research the facts (as they claim).
can only help them survive. Don’t they have any IT folks over there who can explain it to them? It’s called SEO — search engine optimization.
Wade and the Romanoff purity patrols have to account for a good 10% alone.
Let’s wait until after the 10th to see what the drop off rate is. 🙂
The antidote to free speech is more free speech.
rather forgot about ColoradoPols for quite a while, but got back into reading it after I saw the piece on the controversy with the DP – so it turns out it may have been good advertising for you!
.
And are you still paying 2 cents per page view ?
P.s.: my check is a little late this month. Could you look into that for me ?
.
Clearly they were holding you back.