Selling Air: GOP Defends Pointless “Citizen Voter” Initiative

House Minority Leader Patrick Neville (R-Castle Rock).

In the 24 hours since petitions were submitted in support of Initiative 76, a constitutional amendment to duplicatively restate that voting rights in Colorado are restricted to U.S. citizens only–which the constitution already prescribes and is already followed in practice throughout the state with zero exceptions we are aware of–proponents have faced a barrage of questions from reporters, trying to figure out what the point of the measure is beyond the superficial objective of turning out a particular segment of low-information, high-prejudice voters.

The answers? Mostly crazy stuff, with a wink and nod to the desperate realpolitik. Colorado Public Radio:

The Colorado effort has collected more than 200,000 signatures ahead of a Tuesday deadline, likely ensuring they’ll have more than enough ruled valid to qualify for the election, according to Joe Stengel, registered agent for the initiative…

Stengel claimed, without providing any evidence, that noncitizens already are voting in Colorado, despite the existing laws.

“They are voting now, and I think that they’ll probably continue to vote if we don’t ensure the integrity of our elections,” he said. He could not point to any specific examples, he said.

Grand Junction Sentinel:

Stengel, who served as minority leader in the Colorado House before leaving office in 2006, denied that the effort has anything to do with politics.

“It’s a non-partisan issue,” he said. “Democrats, Republicans, independents should all be concerned about voter integrity. Opponents can say whatever they want, but who would not be in favor of voter integrity?”


“This is a great opportunity so that we can get in front of the voters first hand,” said Rep. Patrick Neville (R – District 45), the House Minority Leader. “They are going to get a chance to vote on it.” [Pols emphasis]

Denver Post:

“In my mind, this simply clears up some ambiguous language,” Neville said during a press conference late Tuesday morning, “and ensures we take the first steps to ensure we have election integrity in the state of Colorado.”

We’ll start with the most important point, which is there is absolutely no evidence to support the claim that noncitizens are voting in Colorado elections. Repeated false claims of this kind from former Secretary of State Scott Gessler during his term from 2011-14 fell apart under scrutiny, and it became obvious that Gessler and friends were intentionally omitting the naturalization of new citizens in the state–which completely accounts for these alleged instances of “noncitizen voters” with room to spare.

It’s been necessary for us to revisit this question over and over as the false claims get recycled to new audiences. And every time, whether it’s Gessler or Donald Trump making the allegation, it has always turned out the same way.

Once you get past the easily disproven claims of “noncitizens voting,” proponents seem to acknowledge that Initiative 76 is nothing more than a get-out-the-vote vehicle for beat-down Colorado Republicans in the 2020 elections. Along with the ballot measure to overturn the legislature’s passage of the National Popular Vote Compact, these measures are unapologetically described (at least in private) as a way of giving demoralized Colorado Republicans demotivated by the top of the ticket and the near-inevitability of another impending defeat in our state some reason to return their ballot.

Bottom line: Initiative 76 almost surgically targets a segment of the electorate that Republicans need desperately to vote, namely conservatives in possession of more rage than facts. That’s its entire reason for existence. Like so many other storylines in today’s politics, when the pitch man tells you you’re being too cynical…the reality is that you’re not being cynical enough.


11 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. spaceman65 says:

    This is a great opportunity for wealth transfer from RWNJ sheep to RWNJ wolves.  Tots and pears to all

  2. Diogenesdemar says:

    If and when this passes (?) , there will be a flurry of activity and lawsuits to establish a method and procedures to ensure the “only citizens” requirement.  

    Approved state-issued photo-identity documents required . . .

    ”Pointless”?  Yeah, like, what’s the point of racism, xenophobia, and voter suppression?

    People need to stop just laughing and pointing at these pukes and try to understand what the hell it is they’re up to . . .

  3. bullshit!bullshit! says:

    Raise money, spend money, skim a little for your effort. Hate is a self licking ice cream cone.

  4. JeffcoBlueJeffcoBlue says:

    When is somebody going to point out that Joe Stengel thieved so much per diem in the legislature that was forced into early retirement? I'm surprised to see him showing his face anywhere.

  5. Genghis says:

    My wife got waylaid by a couple of signature gatherers for this piece of shit. Unsurprisingly, they were evasive as hell when it came to explaining why the P.O.S is necessary or desirable. Equally unsurprising was their inability to persuade my wife to sign their petition.

    Yep, this is all about getting racist, stump-jumping garbage humans to the polls come 2020.

    As currently drafted, the state constitution limits voting to U.S. citizens at least 18 years old who meet the Colorado residency requirement. If this P.O.S. initiative succeeds, the state constitution will limit voting to U.S. citizens at least 18 years old who meet the Colorado residency requirement.

    76 is symbolism over substance, to be sure, but the symbolism is not insignificant. "Every" is inclusive-sounding, whereas "only" is restrictive-sounding. Much like "official language" measures, covert racist zeonphobia is still racist xenophobia.

  6. RepealAndReplace says:

    These are best kinds of initiatives…..

    They make no substantive change whatsoever but allow pols to gin up the base and raise money.

  7. JohnInDenverJohnInDenver says:

    anyone know if there is going to be an opposition campaign?  or will there just be talking points issued, pointing out it changes nothing?

  8. DavidThi808DavidThi808 says:

    Maybe I'm being overly paranoid, but this may have another effect.

    The present wording is an affirmative that every citizen can vote.

    The proposed wording removes that affirmation.

    In other words, a law that limits the vote to only citizens over 6' tall would violate the present wording, but would not violate the proposed wording.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account

You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.