Colorado Public Radio reports on how Colorado’s other Democratic presidential contender Sen. Michael Bennet did in last night’s debate–like former Gov. John Hickenlooper the night before, doing what he could with the limited face time he was bound to get on a stage full of big names. And while there weren’t any flubs from Bennet, his last chance to break out of the depths of the presidential pack with a dramatic showing seems to have eluded him:
Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet focused much of his ire during the second presidential debate on the current occupant of the office he’s seeking.
“I believe we have a moral obligation to beat Donald Trump. He has to be a single term president. And we can’t do anything that plays into his hands,” he said…
Bennet’s loudest applause of the night came for his answer on how he would heal the nation’s racial divide. Drawing on his background as superintendent of the Denver Public Schools, Bennet said segregation in education remains a significant problem.
“Our schools are as segregated today as they were 50 years ago. We need a conversation about what’s happening now,” he said.
Bennet did spend some time attacking Sen. Kamala Harris’ health care plan, which was an odd choice given that her plan isn’t even as progressive as that of frontrunners not on last night’s stage like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. But the exchange was collegial, and you got the sense that Bennet was making a point to not say anything overly injurious to other candidates while triangulating from their right.
Both Bennet and Hickenlooper took a similar tack in their respective campaigns for president, generally arguing that other candidates were too far left to beat Donald Trump in 2020. In both cases this campaign message failed to gain traction, mostly because it was out of touch with a Democratic base that is much more supportive of an unapologetic progressive agenda than most of its leadership. Hickenlooper in particular pigeonholed himself early on as the “anti-socialism” candidate, when smart Democrats realized that message played directly into the hands of conservatives–especially coming from such a longshot campaign.
At the same time, none of this was bad enough to rule either out of future contests, and the experience undeniably raised their name ID both in and outside Colorado. The political dynamic in Colorado, driven by a decisive unaffiliated plurality and a state still only tentatively considered blue after 15 years of Democratic electoral wins, is much better suited to the moderate image and message of both men–which helps explain why they both been successful in repeated statewide Colorado elections.
So…we’ll see what comes next.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: It’s Official: Colorado Republicans Need A New Lawyer
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Thursday (March 28)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
The saddest thing about Bennet’s “Swan song” was his standing patiently by while Chris Matthews interviewed Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Andrew Yang, and someone else….but not Bennet. sniff
Passed over for Andrew Yang? That has to hurt!
Aloha.
And, in all honesty, although Senator Bennet was never going to be our next President, I have to admit that by his campaign and his performances this year, he has earned my sincere respect.
I agree…to a degree.
Never a fan, I have often disrespected certain parts of the senators' agenda and rhetoric.
He has impressed with his impassioned loquaciousness, to be sure.
I've grown from skeptic to much respect for MB. He's representing a state evenly divided three ways. Would I prefer he be further left of some of his positions? Sure. But remembering the alternatives were Ken Buck (by less than 29,000 votes) and Mr. Glenn (a more comfortable 155,000 votes) is a gentle reminder of bullets we've dodged over the last decade for that seat. Pair him with a progressive this go-around and we'll be well represented (minus PoddyMouth's gang of misfits)
Right on. This is where I'm at with Bennet too, and I've had spirited debates with friends on my left about it. He represents the state well, even if he doesn't always speak for me.