CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 19, 2010 06:01 AM UTC

Advertising 101: Note to Bennet's Agency

  • 7 Comments
  • by: JeffcoTrueBlue

I just caught Bennet’s new t.v. spot. It was tivo’d so the first time I saw it was with no volume as I fast forwarded through commercials. Here is what I saw: FREEZE  LOSE   BAN   BENNET. I can’t say I disagree with the statement but I really don’t think that’s what they meant.

After I got done laughing I watched the ad on normal speed and I will say it was a somewhat decent spot. For those average voters not following the back and forth with him and Romanoff, the message was pretty good and probably will resonate with voters. It was a little too Pete Coorsish for my liking and Bennet looked tired but if I didn’t know Romanoff had been beating on those same points before Bennet did, I’d probably like what he had to say.

I’d love to see Romanoff run a spot countering the ad and include a clip from their debate of when he challenged Bennet to reject government health insurance until all Americans are covered and Bennet refused. Most people watching the ad will probably never know the hypocrisy of everything in it. So I guess Bennet’s strategy is wait until they hear Romanoff say something the voters like and then spend hundreds of thousands of out of state dollars running ads co-opting the ideas and misleading uninformed voters.

The agency who did and approved this ad should be beaten and flogged though. One of the key rules in television advertising is that before you approve a spot you watch it with the volume off and these days you also watch it on fast forward and slow-motion. Positioning those words exactly in the same place in huge all caps so the sequence reads FREEZE LOSE BAN BENNET is sloppy at best, amateur at worst.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Advertising 101: Note to Bennet’s Agency

  1. Is a Congressional pay freeze the Number One problem facing the United States? Is that what people think?

    More important, perhaps: Is that what Michael Bennet thinks?

    That’s what his ad says he thinks.

    Makes cancelling Congressional health insurance look like, well, like the second most important national priority on his mind.

    The message(s) in the spot are either an insult to Bennet’s intelligence, to his constituents’ intelligence, or both. Or an accurate reflection of the former. What say Mike?

    1. TrueBlue says Bennet is only cribbing from Romanoff’s ideas, but JO says he’s got stupid ideas. Does that mean JO thinks Romanoff’s ideas are stupid? No! It can’t be!

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

109 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!