You may have heard how NYU Professsor Jay Rosen describes those of us who follow the news as, “the people formerly known as the audience.”
The reality isn’t a clear cut, because so many news consumers are sooooooooooooo passive, but the phrase definitely reflects the kind of thinking that should be going on at The Denver Post. How to involve US in THEIR journalism?
So you gotta love The Post’s idea to round up news from Tuesday’s caucuses via Twitter and other social media. In a blog post yesterday, titled “What happens in the caucuses shouldn’t stay in caucus-help us cover them,” Political Editor Curtis Hubbard invites you to help The Post “keep readers up-to-speed on the action during our live blogging from 6 to 10 p.m.” (To make citizen journalism easy, The Post included a link to help you find your caucus.)
You can tweet and send photos (using hashtag #caucusCO), and The Post will share them on its gallery. The Post wants to follow all the candidates as well. Its Twitter list is cited on Hubbard’s post.
In an interview with me last month, Hubbard talked about trying to use citizen journalists, even partisans from different campaigns, this election cycle to give The Post access to political events. It looks like this caucus project is one concrete way this is happening.
If this were to take off in a way that The Post could only dream about, a journalistic dilemma could arise: what if campaign strategists bombarded The Post with fake tweets, attempting to show that one candidate was kicking ass. And what if this influenced the outcome of the caucuses in real time? It would be like releasing exit polls or election results on the East Coast before the polls were closed in the West. Some serious journalists stopped releasing exit polls becuase they didn’t want to influence elections. A wholly theoretical problem for The Post’s caucus project, of course, but a thought, nonetheless.
See complete links at www.bigmedia.org.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: kwtree
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: So You Like Meat, Do You? Ready To Slaughter It Yourself?
BY: kwtree
IN: So You Like Meat, Do You? Ready To Slaughter It Yourself?
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: So You Like Meat, Do You? Ready To Slaughter It Yourself?
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: So You Like Meat, Do You? Ready To Slaughter It Yourself?
BY: bullshit!
IN: So You Like Meat, Do You? Ready To Slaughter It Yourself?
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Campaigns and “rogue” staffers have never created anything fake and electronic. There’s no way that anyone would take advantage to game the system. Don’t be ridiculous.
[/triguardian]
anyone even making a mistake
It looks like there are 22 people here at my caucus and 20 are for candidate X…not sure what that means for candidate Y
Let alone someone actually trying to freep the caucus with a bunch of tweets/chirps/texts and such.