CO-04 (Special Election)
See Full Big Line
(R) Greg Lopez
(R) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%↓
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
90%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
90%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
(R) Ron Hanks
40%
30%
20%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(R) Deborah Flora
(R) J. Sonnenberg
30%↑
15%↑
10%↓
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Dave Williams
(R) Jeff Crank
50%↓
50%↑
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
90%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) Brittany Pettersen
85%↑
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
(R) Janak Joshi
60%↑
35%↓
30%↑
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
February 07, 2019 12:12 PM UTC
31 Comments
Given the history between Romanoff and Bennet (or perhaps more accurately between their supporters), it could be an interesting dynamic between the two should Andrew get the nomination and go on to beat Gardner.
I wish Andrew all the best — I hope he's learned a lot since his CD-6 campaign.
Agreed.
The Green New Deal will have a strong advocate in Andrew. Wish him all the best
Welcome back Wade!
Now that we've run off (or their contracts weren't renewed due to ineffectiveness) most of the Russian trolls, we should test the political spectrum of the current contributors once again.
I just took this political spectrum test for grins:
You are a left social moderate.
Left: 4.71, Libertarian: 0.59
I am a left moderate social libertarian with 3.04 left and 2.09 libertarian. (OK, you can stop laughing, MJ!)
I'm only laughing because we're actually similar. (in the same quadrant, at least).
Scary, isn’t it? Maybe we have more in common than either of us would like to admit.
Checks out:
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 8.99, Libertarian: 2.27
you are a centrist social libertarian.
Left: 0.27, Libertarian: 6.64
And here I thought you were just a cranky old fart
You are a left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 6.68, Libertarian: 2.28
I took that test in 2016. I was into the lower right quadrant.
Also left social moderate, left 4.24, libertarian .86.
Left 5.45, Libertarian 2.98
Left social libertarian; 5.47 left, 4.28 libertarian.
Not the most comprehensive test I've seen, but it gets the job done. I used to be closer to the center before the great orange moron came about…
Additionally, -5.74 on foreign policy (halfway towards non-intervention), -7.74 on culture.
This is such an Andrew Romanoff thing to be doing. 🙂
you are a center-left social libertarian.
Left: 2.2, Libertarian: 3.84
With LOTS of the statements leaving me with "well, it depends."
Yes, I wrestled with the wording of many questions that were couched as absolutes, lacking nuance.
Better not make that the campaign theme – CD1 maybe. Statewide? pretty sure there are some people here who will believe what they here and feel tht O&G will be threatened. And Socialism!
There was no "history"
One winner, one for next time.
Channeling Nancy Reagan: "Just say no".
Until we get a ranked preference ballot with "none of the above" as one of the options "no" is not a realistic answer. The competition so far is Lorena Garcia, Michael Johnston, Keith Pottratz, and Trish Zornio. Who do you like better than Andrew Romanoff?
There might be some "perfect" candidate I like more later on, but of the people actually running so far Romanoff would be my pick.
I like Hick the best, but he is not running.
I will vote in the Democrat primary and I will vote for the person most likely to beat Koch Sucker™ Cory.
So-so answer Dave. Hickenlooper could probably beat Gardner but he is too busy being a moderate.
WTF, Dave, Andrew’s 54 and Hick’s “too old.”
Have you already forgotten everything you’ve written here?
Hick is only too old for President.
I don't give a crap about age of Senator.
Andrew could be a decent choice but has the smell of a loser about him.
Romanoff lost in 2010 when Obama pumped $8 million into Bennet's campaign.
(Obama (Rahm Emanuel) was picking favorites in a number of senate races around the country, and they were all losing. The press was starting to make fun of his choices. He was damned if he going to lose in Colorado, it was the last primary (August of 2010).
Big time Loser: Abraham Lincoln lost his US House seat after one term, and then lost his race for Senator of Illinois.
I confess I volunteered for Romanoff in 2010 because I saw Bennet as far too conservative (borne up by a number of his votes, a number of which infuriated me). This web page was so very very snarky towards Romanoff….but in time I think you've all seen that Bennet has never been a real friend of progressives. He's only showing some zest now because he's got the Presidential gleam in his eyes also.
In fact, Lincoln didn't lose the race for Senator from Illinois– because there wasno race. In those days, legislatures elected senators. The democrats won the legislature though Republicans got more votes. Southern Illinois was democrat and stagnant, northern Illinois fast growing but de facto gerrymandered because the 1850 census applied. With no direct election of senators, lincoln won a i mpressive moral victory but Douglas went back to the Senate.
Romanoff trails Cory in the ever important smile and hair cut dimension. One of the few areas of Gardner consistency.