President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 26, 2010 09:26 PM UTC

Sucks To Be Jane Norton's Spokesman

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The Colorado Independent reports, following up on points made by ex-Rocky Mountain News columnist Jason Salzman earlier in the week:

Senate candidate Jane Norton is being hammered in campaign ads for her support of Referendum C in 2005, which allowed the state to spend roughly $3.7 billion in tax revenues slated to be refunded to tax payers. Conservative voters in the state see Ref C as a major tax hike and a betrayal of the state’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights. The campaign ads are part of an increasingly heated Republican primary battle. Norton is putting out her own campaign ads, one of which- a 60-second spot Politico reports looks more like a news update- targets Pres. Obama, a favored tactic of the Norton campaign so far.

Norton has been the effective frontrunner in the race since she entered in September. A long time political insider whose candidacy was boosted by Washington lobbyists and the national GOP, Norton has made it an unofficial policy that she doesn’t talk about or to her opponents. Nor does she talk to the press.

In reporting the story today, the Denver Post and Politico both talked to Norton Campaign spokesman Nate Strauch. That’s no surprise. As media critic Jason Salzman pointed out in a post at his Big Media blog, yesterday, spokespeople and pre-recorded soundbites are Norton’s preferred modes of dealing with the media…

The trouble is, as the Independent updates this morning, the spokespeople are kind of mangling what’s left of the message after Norton hands it off–maybe not their fault? Maybe there’s only so much you can do? It’s a bit of a tough job some days.

Young energetically anti-big government PPC blogger Ari Armstrong, like many Coloradans, wanted to get straight what Norton meant this week when she said the Obama administration jobs bill was “too small,” a response that suggested longtime government employee Norton was advancing a government solution to the jobs crisis. Armstrong didn’t get hold of Norton; he got hold of her spokesman Nate Strauch. Suffice it to say, Armstrong got the better of Strauch in the exchange which, given what he has had to deal with week to week as Norton drops bombs at small gatherings across the state, is to say nothing against Strauch.

What Norton meant to say, explained Strauch, was that she would cut taxes to small businesses!

Armstrong appreciated the late-game sloganeering but didn’t really buy it as a policy stand. He also joined the chorus of writers mocking Norton’s commitment to communication with the people she aims to represent.

Yeah, we figured that “too small” stuff might be trouble, and there you go. Surely, though, Nate Strauch shouldn’t find that any harder to backflip around than the federal government having “no role” in health care (except Medicare of course, don’t be silly!). You can certainly understand why they are trying to keep an iron grip on Norton’s troublesome off-script availability, though–among other things, it’s a big factor in how her spokesman’s next day at the office goes.

Comments

12 thoughts on “Sucks To Be Jane Norton’s Spokesman

      1. Sign: NO CAMERAS

        This is 2010, when most people carry a video cam with them all the time, integrated into their cell phone.  

        Do Norton staffers collect cell phones at the door ?

        .

  1. she says something incredibly stupid like this

    cut government spending, eliminated waste, and de-funded Planned Parenthood

    Since cancer and STDs are such great things who really needs health care services!

    I don’t think she’s an empty suit or a ghost candidate – she’s just that dumb.

    1. .

      and it is a hot-button issue for some of the people who vote in the primary.  

      but I think you are taking a smart tack, talking as if Planned Parenthood was primarily about health care.

      .

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

149 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!