2018-19 #TrumpShutdown Day 33 Open Thread

“My fingers are long and beautiful, as, it has been well been documented, are various other parts of my body.”

–Donald Trump

37 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. deathpigeon | they/them says:

    In times like these when the Trump administration is making moves to make life worse for trans people and the discourse around trans people is getting incredibly toxic, y'all really need to take the opportunity to listen to what trans people have to say and not blithely deny pretty basic facts about us.

    Consider, for example, that you might not actually be as knowledgeable about trans issues as you think you are, and certainly not as much as actual trans people.

    • Voyageur says:

      For your part, you can accept your white privilege and stop showing bigotry toward black women, many of whom endure far more discrimination than you do.

      • deathpigeon | they/them says:

        Ok. I accept that I have white privilege, just like I experience oppression for being trans, queer, neurodivergent, and working class. But what bigotry are you speaking of in particular?

        • Voyageur says:

          God, you are hooked on victim status.   It's an opiate to you.

          • deathpigeon | they/them says:

            Maybe you can back up what you're saying with argument instead of using empty right wing rhetoric. Oppression exists against people of color, queer people, including trans people, women, neurodivergent people, disabled people, working class people, etc. These can be seen in metrics such as increased poverty, increased likelihood of being killed, or increased rates of suicide as well as in social structures, such as lack of control over yourself at work, legal standards which exclude who you are, or hostility from agents of the state, such as cops. These are facts about the world, however much you might want to deny them.

            • Voyageur says:

              Don't forget you once claimed no less than four mental illness.  One was ocd, i forget the other three.

              Go back to living in your Ay n Rand novel.  It's all about you in yourworld but your constant whining is boring.

              • deathpigeon | they/them says:

                your constant whining is boring

                Right, I'm the one whining by *checks notes* talking about the effects of social systems on groups of people unlike you who's, uh, *checks notes* getting upset that someone is mentally ill and is trans and talking about the social effects of that. Cool, cool.

    • JohnInDenver says:

      Any chance we can simplify to "everyone is unique" and deserves the same rights?  Your experience is no doubt different than Colonel Jennifer Pritzker (ret.).  And different than the first trans person I can recall, Professor Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, who I first knew at Professor Donald McCloskey. (reference here.).

      • ParkHill says:

        Not that you are implying this, but…

        Sorry, "everyone deserves the same rights" is inadequate to the problem. Oppression is dependent on the power relationship between the "unique" individuals.

        The classic case is the one of "Everyone has the right to sleep under bridges, both the rich and the poor."

        Everyone has the right to enter Harvard, the legacy applicants and the graduate from a public school.

        Racism against African Americans is different from racism against White people. (Remember, racism is about structures of oppression; bigotry is about not liking someone.)

        Conservatives, especially Conservative Judges on the Supreme Court, claim that if we have a color-blind legal system, racism doesn't exist: "Lynching is just old-history, We gave them the vote, They are free to go into the stores, schools, restaurants and hotels, They are free to buy houses anywhere they want…" 

        My point is that racism and other structural and cultural forms of oppression are not history: "The past is never dead. It's not even past."

      • deathpigeon | they/them says:

        The issue is with implementation. Like, apply this to abortion, and we can get "everyone deserves the same rights, and those rights don't include abortion". That's the same rights, but it's done in such a way that one group (people who can get pregnant) is negatively effected in another group (people who can't) isn't.

        Similarly, with trans people, everyone being referred to by the people around them and by legal documents exclusively by the gender they were assigned at birth is everyone getting the same rights, but it's negatively impacting trans people in a way it isn't negatively impacting cis people.

  2. Duke Cox says:

    Hey, Alva…

    How about citing sources on these Trump quotes you keep pumping out? I am thinking you are making up at least some of them.

    On the other hand, I don't have a Twitter account, and none of it seems out of character for the Baby King…but, really?

    C'mon…fess up.🤔

    • deathpigeon | they/them says:

      According to this:

      (In response to Spy magazine’s go-to qualifier of Trump as a “short-fingered vulgarian,” Trump told Page Six, “My fingers are long and beautiful, as, it has been well documented, are various other parts of my body.”)

      • Gray in Mountains says:

        As I hope a response I made to Cook made clear, I am open to learning much more about transgender people. I agree I need to listen and that assumptions based on language or my previous life experience are, so far, not very helpful. So, teach.

        • deathpigeon | they/them says:

          Well, what's been tripping you up regarding trans people? I find it easier to start from something you might not understand than to have no starting point at all.

          • Gray in Mountains says:

            Not tripped up. Just absorbing what I see and hear. It was difficult to begin referring to her when I'd known him. Felt bad when I referred to her as him a few times.

             

            What is cis?

            • deathpigeon | they/them says:

              Ah, yeah. It can take some getting used to when switching pronouns. So long as you try your best, she shouldn't mind too much. Even I struggle sometimes with pronouns when someone I knew as cis comes out as trans. So long as you're trying and you aren't a dick about it, messing up isn't that big of a deal.

              Cis is the opposite of trans, basically. A transgender person is someone who's gender doesn't match up with what they were assigned at birth. A cisgender person is someone who's gender does match up with what they were assigned at birth.

            • notaskinnycook says:

              Gray, Dead Bird’s right. As long as it's not malicious (you'd be surprised at how often it is) dropping a pronoun now and again shouldn't cause a transperson that much distress. If you do it in their presence, just acknowledge the goof and move on.

              • deathpigeon | they/them says:

                Yeah. I generally only actually have a problem when they follow up the mistake with whining about bullshit grammar rules or how I shouldn't be so offended or whatever or if they seem to be making no effort to gender me correctly. So long as you're trying and you're not a dick, you're fine.

              • Gray in Mountains says:

                Cook, bird: it was in her presence. I did ask forbearance and she said "don't worry".

                As I said, this past summer and continuing now, in my very small town, which I've always found extremely tolerant, at least 4 folks are transitioning, one even with a full beard

  3. davebarnes says:

    Nancy: “What do want to end the shutdown Donald?”
    Donnie: “I want $5.7G for my Wall.”
    Nancy: “You’ve got it. Are you sure that is enough?”
    Donnie: “What?”
    Nancy: “I want 12M green cards. Do we have a deal?”

    • DENependent says:

      No. I have said it before and I will keep saying it, just as you keep repeating your 12 million green cards line.

      The first and most important thing when negotiating with a hostage taker is to prevent him taking hostages again. Give Donnie his wall only as part of legislation that will prevent any future shutdowns. No more debt ceiling bullshit, no more last minute budgets, legislation that will fund the government in the absence of adult behavior by congress, the president, or whoever.

    • Diogenesdemar says:

      No.  

      Just because you and Pelosi are both over 56 doesn’t mean she’s forgotten how to deal with a toddler.

      https://newrepublic.com/article/152936/nancy-pelosis-finest-hour

      You don’t give a pouty five-year old $5B just because “more Lego blocks” are his favorite obsession-of-the-month.

    • Genghis says:

      That bill is some rippingly hilarious stuff. Pay $20 to the Arizona Commerce Authority for the privilege of being able to continue punching the clown to internet porn. The money funds something called the John McCain Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Fund (poor John is dead and thus unable to oppose his name being tacked onto this horseshit), which provides grants for noble public purposes, including without limitation building a wall on the Arizona-Mexico border.

      Also:

      7. "SPECIFIED ANATOMICAL AREA" MEANS EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING:
      (a) LESS THAN COMPLETELY AND OPAQUELY COVERED HUMAN GENITALS, PUBIC REGION, BUTTOCK OR FEMALE BREAST BELOW A POINT IMMEDIATELY ABOVE THE TOP OF THE AREOLA.
      (b) HUMAN MALE GENITALS IN A DISCERNIBLY TURGID STATE, WHETHER COVERED OR UNCOVERED.

      I feel safer already! Let's five-knuckle-shuffle our way to national security!

  4. Davie says:

    It seems a RWNJ tracker attending an informal coffee shop gathering with Rep. Joe Neguse last week taped him mentioning in response to an attendee's question, the potential of an investigation into perjury by Brett Kavanaugh.

    The sound in the video isn't very good, so my old ears can't confirm this story that I'm sure conservatives will take as proof their persecution complex is totally justified.

    • JohnInDenver says:

      I suspect if someone asks Rep. Neguse, now on the House Judiciary Committee, about this, he'd be happy to make it clearer than the bad recording.

      Finding out if prominent people are honoring their oaths while testifying to Congress seems like worthwhile oversight to me.

    • I believe Rep. Jerry Nadler, now the Chair of the Judiciary Committee, is on record supporting such an investigation. Neguse saying "there's no doubt" is a bit strong, but the documentation is pretty strong… there's direct proof he lied during his prior confirmation hearing, and he did nothing to resolve that during his SCOTUS hearing.

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.