( – promoted by Colorado Pols)
Politics reporter Marshall Zelinger of KRDO-Channel 13 in Colorado Springs did some digging in a recent report on Proposition 101. Instead of relying on talking heads and bullet points, he decided to find out what Prop 101 would mean to him, as a resident of El Paso County who pays an ownership tax when he renews his license plates.
Proposition 101 would blow holes in the state’s budget, but it would wreck local budgets, too. Among its many reckless provisions, Prop 101 would slash the ownership tax over time to $2 for new cars and $1 for used cars.
This year, Marshall paid $183.71. Under Prop 101, his fee would drop to $1.
What would that mean for schools, libraries, municipalities and county services in El Paso County? Let’s use Marshall’s example and take a look at how the county distributes ownership taxes paid on vehicles.
Current———–Prop 101
Schools————-$128.62…..70 cents
County————–$20.50……11.2 cents
Service districts—$14.56…….7.9 cents
Cities/towns——–$11.45……..6.2 cents
Libraries————$8.58………..4.7 cents
Total—————$183.71…….$1.00
When Marshall talked to motorists at a gas station, they were thrilled to hear about a possible tax cut. When he showed them what they would lose, they were taken aback. Most people changed their mind and decided the money was well-spent.
It looks like their tax dollars really are at work.
Click here to see Marshall’s report. Click here for an analysis of Prop 101 by the Bell Policy Center.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Maeton Jameson
IN: New Democrats Look to Challenge in Historically-Republican District
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Marla Robbinson
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Snap Up Those Cheap EVs While You Can, Colorado
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
And I love to see good reporting. Kudos to Marshall.
Great story! It’s easy to talk about cutting taxes and fees in the abstract and quite another to see the impact on your community. Nice story Bell.
thread building after the story.
“This is just scare tactics”
“Keep the government out of my wallet”
“I don’t have any kids and I don’t go to the public library”
One of the commenters uses the old saw: I’d rather just give the money straight to my local school and cut out the cost of gov’t bureaucracy.
ugh.
should go down to ElPaso and explain progressivism to these Colorado voters.
EPCounty will not be carried by the D Senate candidate in the 2010 general. But a D candiate who can’t win at least 35% is in trouble state wide.
and explain why gas should be $6-$7/gal.
It won’t help- but I love talking fuel taxes with riled up Coloradoans.
that reporter has some serious guts. Has he put his resume out, yet?
If McInnis frames the election as giving people money back – advantage McInnis. If Ritter can frame it as the government provides needed services – advantage Ritter.
Too many Dem office holders are afraid to make a straight up argument for government and what taxes buy and that leaves them on the defensive.
A small market TV reporter got a solid story out of looking at the proposals and examining the simple questions underlying its impact. Probably took him maybe an hour to do and verify the math.
Maybe some of the other “mainstream” media in the state should follow his lead and do some journalism on issues with a direct impact on their readers instead of devoting scarce news hole and reporting time to issues that — if they ever did any real readership surveys — would barely move the needle.