(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Janak Joshi
80%
40%
20%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
50%
40%↓
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
50%↑
40%↓
30%
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Wanda James
(D) Milat Kiros
80%
20%
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Alex Kelloff
(R) H. Scheppelman
60%↓
40%↓
30%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
30%↑
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
55%↓
45%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
As the Pueblo Chieftain reports:
Senate candidate Jane Norton said Wednesday that she doesn’t want the federal government to condemn land to expand the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site…
Norton said she would allow ranchers who want to sell their land to the U.S. Army to do so.
But, “I wouldn’t support condemnation,” she said. “I don’t think that’s the right way to go.” Ranchers near the Army training site in Las Animas County have waged a long political war to stop any expansion.
Norton didn’t say she would oppose an expansion. Expansion should be allowed only if economic benefits from the site are shared with the Southern Colorado region.
The Pinon Canyon site was pitched to area leaders in the 1980s as having a great economic impact from spending by soldiers. That hasn’t really happened, Norton acknowledged.
“The broken promises from the Army have certainly added to the distrust,” she said.
Like Rep. Mike Coffman said recently, she might be “more sympathetic if the U.S. Army were to declare itself a terrorist organization.”
Of course, we’ve been clear that Josh Penry’s (and Bill Ritter’s) stand on Pinon Canyon is by far the better politics, and more consistent with the views of the property rights-sensitive Republican base, so Norton is being smart to pay lip service to protecting the ranchers. Though if Coffman’s ‘terrorist sympathizer’ rhetoric is good for the goose…well, consistency demands, doesn’t it?
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments