“Your theory is crazy, but it’s not crazy enough to be true.”
–Niels Bohr
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Who Will Win the Republican Vacancy Appointment in CO-04?
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: It’s Official: Colorado Republicans Need A New Lawyer
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Thursday (March 28)
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Yes, Please: Guns Out Of The State Capitol
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Get More Smarter on Thursday (March 28)
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
You want too crazy to be true? Try reading some of the material on the kilonova that astronomers first saw in August. It took a 130 million years for the light of those colliding collapsed stars and 650 trillion miles before it reached our planet.
What is crazy is that gravity is by far, the weakest force. Speculation is, the reason for that is it projects most of its force into the other dimensions (11 in all) and/or parallel universes.
I just read hawkings brief history of time. He notes that while gravity is the weakest force, it is cumulative. The others cancel each other out, like magnetism.
Yes, that makes it unique. Symmetry is a fundamental concept in physics. Gravity and the Arrow of Time aren't, which is why both are still so mysterious…
what is truly spectacular, is how they measure these waves…and, AND this latest observation is thought to have "made" about 100 times the weight of the Earth, in gold…this seems to have put us on a path to new discoveries, and new theories…
Establishment Democrats are hooked on Wall St. Cash and, despite the incompetence and ignorance of their Opponents, and the seemingly inevitable demographic shift of the electorate (see "Blacks vote for Trump"), they are condemned to keep losing key elections (that is: every election, esp. those the Russians are able to hack) due to this idiotic addiction, their inability to support, defend, and implement basic Democratic policies, and their chronic quest for bipartisanship with a bunch of sociopaths.
Have fun guys. You can probably go ahead and plan the Michael Bennet – Senator for Life tributes to the guy who gets the cash. He may stay in office, but his "accomplishments" won't be much more than they are now if he continues his current Establishment Democratic, Pro-Wall-Street strategy.
The trouble with short versions of history is they oversimplify.
For example, in the 2010 election, one race featured Sen. Russell Feingold. Couldn't ask for a more anti-Wall Street incumbent candidate … "On May 20, 2010, Feingold was one of two Democratic senators to vote against the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform bill, citing his belief that the measures did not go far enough. On July 15, 2010, he became the only Democratic senator to vote against the bill when it was brought up again; it passed by a 60-39 vote." In the 2010 election, he lost to a non-politician, businessman Ron Johnson, by a 52 – 47 margin.
In 2016, he was running again against the now one-term incumbent, Ron Johnson, who is not seen as a strong campaigner or someone who was universally liked in Wisconsin. Feingold was endorsed by Bernie Sanders. He raised a great deal of money, the most of any challenger of a Republican incumbent, with little of it from Wall Street. And yet, he lost again, by 50 – 47 margin — the Libertarian in the election picked up the 2% differential.
So tell me again how the "anti-Wall Street" Democrats are going to be successful.
TrumpWorld illustrated…