CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 13, 2017 11:34 AM UTC

Gardner's Push for Trump to Unilaterally Dismantle Obamacare Is Coming to Fruition

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Like we said – Promoted by Colorado Pols)

U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) has yet to comment on Trump’s latest effort to deliver a body blow to Obamacare by eliminating insurance assistance for low-income people.

But in March, Gardner said he hoped Trump would use his presidential authority, ASAP, to dismantle Obamacare.

“We also, I believe, need the Administration to move forward with some of its executive actions,” Gardner told KHOW 630-AM’s Ross Kaminsky. “Those executive actions they can take won’t ever be scored by the Congressional Budget Office. That’s not what the Congressional Budget Office does. But if they take those actions, it could result in significant improvement in the current system.” [listen below]

You may recall, in the spring, the Congressional Budget Office estimated for the first time that tens of millions of Americans would lose health insurance under the House GOP’s proposal to repeal Obamacare. The uninsured would include hundreds of thousands in Colorado.

The specter of millions of Americans losing health insurance generated such coast-to-coast angst and blow back that the seven-year GOP effort to kill Obamacare seemed doomed to die in the House.

So that’s why a gloomy Gardner, calling Obamacare “a disaster for the American people,” was looking at how Obamacare could be rolled back without legislation. Without repealing the law, Trump could do a lot through executive actions, Gardner said, and, bonus, they won’t be scored by the CBO, so we won’t get the nonpartisan estimate of the resultant misery. Not to mention the headlines.

Fast forward to yesterday.

Trump signed more executive orders aimed at Obamacare, as Gardner hoped he would, but it turns out Gardner was wrong about the CBO–at least with respect to one of Gardner’s orders.

That’s because, a few months after Gardner’s radio appearance, Democrats asked the CBO to analyze what would happen if Trump eliminated Obamacare subsidies for insurance on the individual market. The CBO report was completed back in August, but it’s getting a lot of attention now, because it shows that Trump’s order will increase health insurance rates on the individual market by 20 percent in 2018 and that one million more Americans will lose insurance entirely next year, compared with current law.

Obamacare supporters say Congress can stop this chaos, without increasing the deficit, by providing the Obamacare funds that Trump wants to cut. They would be used to lower the cost of health insurance for low-income people, as Obamacare stipulates.

But Gardner will have to change his thinking drastically to get on board. To date, he’s backed everything and anything in Congress to kill Obamacare. And when it looked like Congress wasn’t going to be able to do it, he called on unilateral action by Trump.

Now, with the full repercussions of Trump’s orders out in the open will Gardner shift his position, break his alliance with Trump, and endorse bipartisan congressional efforts to fix Obamacare, rather then nuke it?

Listen to Gardner on KHOW 630-AM Thursday, March 14:

Listen to the entire interview here:

Full text:

HOST ROSS KAMINSKY: One of your Senate colleagues, Tom Cotton, has said in recent days that the House bill for repeal [of Obamacare] really has to be changed, in part because this so-called three part process can’t work, mainly the third part with new legislation won’t get through a Senate when it requires 60 votes. So, he says the whole thing needs to change. What is your take on that?

U.S. SENATOR FROM COLORADO, AND CHAIR OF THE NRSC, CORY GARDNER: Well, again, there are three parts. Let me just make sure that people know what those three parts are. The first part is what can be done right now with this bill as it moves through the House and whatever changes it proceeds. The second part is executive action, what the Trump administration can do under the guise of current law to change and create a stable insurance market. And the third tranch – that’s the third bucket, that Senator Cotton is talking about – is what takes place by passing new legislation. That could take 60 votes. All three of them need to work together to create the best situation possible. We need bipartisan support to do that. And we also, I believe, need the Administration to move forward with some of its executive actions [to repeal parts of Obamacare]. So, those executive actions they can take won’t ever be scored by the Congressional Budget Office, because that’s not what the Congressional Budget Office does. But if they take those actions, it could result in significant improvement in the current system.

Comments

11 thoughts on “Gardner’s Push for Trump to Unilaterally Dismantle Obamacare Is Coming to Fruition

  1. So in CoryLand, millions of families losing coverage, getting sick, dying (and many going deep into debt or even bankruptcy) is a "significant improvement in the current system"

    There you have it, folks — today's Republican Party "values"

    1. Careful.  You're going to make our little nutlid horny.  He loves people dying and going bankrupt and general suffering.  Especially from inability to get healthcare. 

      Because the invisible hand didn't help people with healthcare problems in the past.  

      1. Because the invisible hand didn't help people with healthcare problems in the past.

        Well, it may helped with diagnosing prostate problems but your point is well taken.

  2. Meanwhile in Akron…

    Dollar General Hits a Gold Mine in Rural America 

    Important story here, considering how the number of dollar stores has grown in rural America. Money quote: “Essentially what the dollar stores are betting on in a large way is that we are going to have a permanent underclass in America. It’s based on the concept that the jobs went away, and the jobs are never coming back, and that things aren’t going to get better in any of these places.”

    1. My girlfriend works for this corporation. They set new standards in exploiting their workers and their customers. She works one day a week there and gets to observe the unbelievable demands they make on their salaried people. She hates it and is only there because of her devotion to the store manager. Even at one day per week, it breaks her heart to go to work, where she tries her best to be kind and helpful.

      The tales I hear when she comes in from work are of a customer base that uses EBT cards for everything.  It is that permanent underclass mentioned in the story at your link. An American disgrace…

    2. When I was visiting family in South Carolina a couple of months ago, I was amazed at the number of those places everywhere in the state.

      The other thing that is popular are so-called auctions which are basically indoor flea markets. 

      On the other hand, I saw one Starbucks in Columbia conveniently located next to the J. Crew store.

  3. I wonder if the CBO is going to score Trump's executive order.  That would be an interesting twist.  How many people are going to lose coverage and get nothing in return for Trump's actions?  The number would probably make a Halloween ghoul blanche.

    1. They’ve already done some of that scoring:

      The government’s costs are also likely to rise, since subsidies to purchase insurance through the marketplaces increase as premiums rise. The Congressional Budget Office said in August that if the cost-sharing subsidies were cut off, premiums would shoot up 20 percent next year, and federal budget deficits would increase by $194 billion in the coming decade.

      End to Health Care Subsidies Puts Congress in a Tight Spot

      http://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/13/us/politics/trump-congress-obamacare-insurance-subsidies.html

       

       

       

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

86 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!