Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Knowledge Messenger

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Payday Lending Bill Dies

by: Colorado Pols

Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 13:50:14 PM MDT


According to a press release from The Center for Policy Entrepreneurship:

Sponsors of House Bill 1310, a bill that in its original form would have protected Coloradans from predatory lending, said today they will kill the legislation.

"We are killing this bill because as amended it no longer protects hardworking Coloradans," said Senate President Peter Groff. "The bill as it sits now protects industry profits that are garnered with interest rates that average more than 350 percent. That just isn't right."

"We began this effort to rein in excessive fees earned on the backs of hardworking Coloradans," said Rep. Mark Ferrandino. "The amendments to the bill actually make the situation worse for Coloradans."...

..."The Senate amendments put profits above working people," said Spiros Protopsaltis, President of the Center for Policy Entrepreneurship. "Before it was hijacked by the industry and its allies, House Bill 1310 would have closed a loophole created by the Legislature in 2000. That loophole, which exempts the payday lending industry from Colorado interest caps, lures and traps borrowers into an unanticipated and costly cycle of long-term debt they cannot easily escape.  Clearly, these amendments protect the industry's profits through endless loan rollovers."

Curiously it was a handful of Democrats who weakened the bill so much that it's sponsors decided to kill it.

Full press release follows.

Colorado Pols :: Payday Lending Bill Dies
Sponsors of House Bill 1310, a bill that in its original form would have protected Coloradans from predatory lending, said today they will kill the legislation.

"We are killing this bill because as amended it no longer protects hardworking Coloradans," said Senate President Peter Groff. "The bill as it sits now protects industry profits that are garnered with interest rates that average more than 350 percent. That just isn't right."

"We began this effort to rein in excessive fees earned on the backs of hardworking Coloradans," said Rep. Mark Ferrandino. "The amendments to the bill actually make the situation worse for Coloradans."  

"As a former payday loan consumer, I am disappointed that the Senate failed to pass a reasonable reform bill," said ACORN leader Linda Medlock. "I was trapped in a cycle of debt for years. These loans are marketed as short-term, emergency access to cash.  After paying $7,800 in fees over four years on a $500 loan, I know from personal experience they are anything but that."  

The Colorado Payday Lending Reform Initiative - the broad-based coalition that is pushing reform of an industry that takes advantage of people in dire straits and traps them in a cycle of debt - agreed with the move.

"The Senate amendments put profits above working people," said Spiros Protopsaltis, President of the Center for Policy Entrepreneurship. "Before it was hijacked by the industry and its allies, House Bill 1310 would have closed a loophole created by the Legislature in 2000. That loophole, which exempts the payday lending industry from Colorado interest caps, lures and traps borrowers into an unanticipated and costly cycle of long-term debt they cannot easily escape.  Clearly, these amendments protect the industry's profits through endless loan rollovers."

"The members of the coalition want to thank Senator Groff and Rep. Ferrandino for their hard work on this issue," Protopsaltis said. "While we didn't get as far as we had hoped this year everyone now knows about the outrageous and predatory interest and fees charged by this industry. The cat is out of the bag."

"We'll be back," Protopsaltis pledged.

House Bill 1310 sought to protect consumers and still allow the payday loan industry to make a profit by capping the interest rate at 45 percent, reducing the fees lenders can charge and setting a 30-day minimum repayment period.  In contrast, the amendments create an even costlier cycle of debt by allowing endless loan fees and specifically setting a 7-day repayment period, making it even harder for borrowers to get out of the cycle of debt.

"The amendments are good for the industry, not the consumers," said Rich Jones, Director of Policy and Research at the Bell Policy Center.  "House Bill 1310 intended to put back into the pockets of hardworking Coloradans the $75 million spent each year on excessive payday loan interest and fees.  It's disappointing that the amendments are in opposition to the bill's intent and make things worse for borrowers, but we'll be back next year."

A report released in February by CPE and the Bell Policy Center showed that a law passed by the Legislature in 2000 creating the payday loan industry in Colorado had far-reaching unintended consequences.  Also known as deferred deposit loans, payday loans are short-term, typically two weeks and secured with a post-dated check signed by the borrower. Payday loans cannot exceed $500 and the maximum finance charge is $75.  But instead of serving as one-time emergency loans, the terms make it nearly impossible for them to be paid back on time and lead to continuous borrowing.  Among the report's findings:  

Borrowers took out an average of 9 loans;
The average payday loan annual interest rate (APR) was 353 percent;
The average borrower paid $544 to borrow $343;
Almost 2 out of 3 payday loans (65 percent) were either refinanced loans or loans given to a borrower the same day as the previous loan was paid off ("rollover loans");
During 2000-2006, 70 percent of all loans went to borrowers who had 11 or more loans in the past 12 months.

"The industry may have won a one-year extension of its gold rush at the expense of working families, but its time is running out both nationally and in Colorado," said Jones.

"House Bill 1310 provided reasonable reform," Protopsaltis said. "Reigning in the payday lending industry is a national trend. Presidential candidates Senators Obama and Clinton support a national payday loan APR cap of 36% and 30% respectively and a growing number of states are taking action.  It's a matter of time before the interests of consumers overcome the industry's massive lobbying and advertising expenditures in Colorado as well."

The federal government and several states have taken action to place reasonable restrictions on the interest and fees payday lenders can charge and to protect consumers from unfair and predatory repayment terms.  In 2007, the U.S. Department of Defense determined that payday loans were a harmful product and Congress mandated a 36 percent rate cap on payday loans for military personnel and their dependents.  Twelve states have taken a variety of approaches in regulating payday lending, from criminalizing it to capping the interest rate, while several others are currently considering legislation, including Virginia, South Carolina, Ohio and Kentucky.  

"Two out of three Coloradans support protecting consumers from predatory payday loans and reducing the amount of fees and interest rate lenders can charge," Protopsaltis said. "A poll of active voters CPE commissioned in January showed overwhelming support among respondents regardless of political affiliation, region, gender, income, education level, ethnicity and age."

The Colorado Payday Lending Reform Initiative includes AARP of Colorado, ACORN, Bell Policy Center, Center for Policy Entrepreneurship, Colorado Progressive Coalition, Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Colorado Women's Agenda, Colorado Women's Lobby, FRESC, Greater Metro Denver Ministerial Alliance, LARASA, Latina Initiative, Lutheran Advocacy Ministry, Mile High United Way, Metro Organizations for People, SEIU Local 105, Women's Foundation of Colorado and 9 to 5 National Organization of Working Women.

#

About the Center for Policy Entrepreneurship

The Center for Policy Entrepreneurship (CPE) is a private, non-profit public policy research and advocacy organization dedicated to identifying, developing and bringing to life creative and effective solutions to critical challenges facing Colorado. For more information please visit www.c-pe.org

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
So, who killed it?
I can't seem to find any information in the bill history that would indicate just how this bill died.

What amendments were offered that effectively killed it, and who sponsored them?

"I have come to the conclusion that the making of laws is like the making of sausages-the less you know about the process the more you respect the result."  -- Anonymous IL State Rep. circa 1878


I was wondering the same thing n/t


To whom much is given much is expected.

[ Parent ]
From the Rocky
Sponsors kill payday loan bill
By David Milstead, Rocky Mountain News
Originally published 11:55 a.m., April 22, 2008

A bill designed to cut fees on payday loans is dead.

Sponsors of House Bill 1310 said today they will kill the legislation. They're unhappy with an amendment from Sen. Jennifer Veiga, D-Denver, that was added on the Senate floor March 25.

"We are killing this bill because, as amended, it no longer protects hardworking Coloradans," Senate President Peter Groff, D-Denver, said in a statement. "The bill as it sits now protects industry profits that are garnered with interest rates that average more than 350 percent. That just isn't right."

Rep. Mark Ferrandino, D-Denver, the original House sponsor, said the amendments "actually make the situation worse for Coloradans."

Ferrandino's bill restricted fees the lenders could charge to one loan per customer in a one-year period. It also imposed a maximum interest rate of 45 percent and created a minimum 30-day term for the loans.

Veiga's amendment allowed the fees to apply to every payday loan, not only the first, and reduced the minimum term to seven days.

The Bell Policy Center, a group that strongly supported the bill, calculated that the Veiga amendment returned effective interest rates to a range of 350 percent to 566 percent on a 14-day loan. It actually increased the rate on a 14-day, $100 loan, Bell President Wade Buchanan said in an interview in late March.

Veiga said today she did not intend to kill the bill with her amendment. "My intention was to preserve an avenue for emergency cash for Coloradans while increasing and enhancing consumer protection," she said. "My amendment was a compromise. ... I thought it added some great consumer protection, and I'm disappointed I couldn't get the proponents to agree."


I'm a bit disappointed in Sen. Veiga.
I like her, but either she folded under the pressure on this one or she didn't do the math before presenting the amendment. Either way, not cool. If it's the latter, I think she should have apologized.

[ Parent ]
I'm a little surprised at this too
I wonder what the back story is on Viega's amendment. This seems out of character for her.  

[ Parent ]
Shame on you, Jennifer!


"Collective fear stimulates herd instinct and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd." -Bertrand Russell


[ Parent ]
I'm disappointed as well.
And a Veiga constituent and campaign volunteer.

I am also inclined to think that the "did not intent to kill the bill" statement was disingenuous.  I am fairly certain that she knew very well that the amendment would, at least, have gutted the bill.  This was no issue of bad math.

I don't see a good motive for this either.


[ Parent ]
Democrats and special interests
This session has proven what no one should have doubted:  Democrats are not immune from special interest groups that are willing to spend.  The Pay Day Loan industry is such a group, and it successfully killed this bill.  The bail bonding industry (primary the insurance companies that underwrite) is another, and they successfully killed a Dem bill that would have significantly reformed the bail bonding practice.  That bill had broad support by the various players involved in the criminal justice system, was not opposed by the D.A.s, etc.

This is an argument both against the naivete of some of my fellow Dems and for campaign finance reform.


Holy smokes, Paper Tiger, he's right!
Who are these Democrats who don't believe interest groups pull political strings, all over the place? I appreciate your sentiment, and it's a point worth bashing Viega over, but this isn't news to anyone after the fourth grade.

It's just, I tend to prefer many of the special interests who pull Democratic strings -- trial lawyers vs. insurance companies, unions vs. corporate interests, enviros vs. polluters or gas-and-oil industry, consumers vs. all of the above.

But yes, the Dems who do the bidding of payday loan operatives and the bail bond industry should have to account for their actions.



[ Parent ]
Don't forget rent-to-own
another prominent abusive industry with high profile democrats like Wellington Webb, behind them.

[ Parent ]
micro finance
Obama's mother developed the micro finance industry in Asia. From what I understand it works well there and is managed by the banks themselves.

Looks like we created this industry 8 years ago, trashing it with a bill so quickly was bound to drive opposition to those businesses operating in this sector. I am not suprised. Before blaming Veiga, we should examine more closely.

Hate to say it, but these folks trapped in the cycle of refinance may have other issues too. I don't know the pay day issue and don't want to offend, but not being able to repay a $300-500 loan seems odd ... drugs, lacking home economics tools, in dire need to keep up with the Jones for the latest new LCD TV or Mexican vacation might drive use of these financial products too.

I am sure there are heart breaking stories too involving kids hospital bills and the like.


How about
living paycheck to paycheck (as fully HALF of American households do) and your next paycheck is $500, which you need for the next two week's expenses, so you roll over part of the loan, which has grown through fees and usurious interest. And so on.

Or, yeah, your version, where it's drugs, a new LCD TV, Mexican vacation ... those are the scourges of the American lower middle class. Maybe if we kept poor people out of Best Buy we could turn this country around.


[ Parent ]
Geeeez
Obviously I missed that this is a feudal industry, likely developed by the radical military-industrial complex and now overseen by queen Jennifer. Time to take her head for it.

Better we make them turn to crime to get by or hit the streets for mafia style loans.

I was just trying to suggest that there are micro finance models that seem to work and maybe some personal control could be used.


[ Parent ]
With the present...
With the present problem we are facing today in our economy, people need financial options to assist us on our financial needs. I am grateful to have the option to utilize quick loans if or when I find myself in a financial jam. Honestly, I used to feel embarrassed and thought I was the only one, but in time I realized there are other people out there who need a little financial help from time to time. Quick loans have helped many people get back on track - a quick rescue for those unexpected episodes. However, this does not mean I am kiteboarding or plan to do so. So, getting hit by a whale tail would probably be the last thing that could ever happen to me. Yet, it happened. You see, Mother Nature paid a visit a couple months ago. A powerful windstorm hit our hometown, causing the power to go out. It really didn't bother me that much because I immediately went to bed. It was the loud crash that woke me up. I was shocked when I discovered the beautiful maple in our backyard had splintered under the force of the wind and crashed right through the kitchen roof. Talk about odd news. Thankfully, no one was hurt. Our insurance covered most of the expense, but the hole in the roof also left a hole in my budget. Luckily, I was able to obtain quick loans to get my family a hotel for awhile.

Click to read more on Kiteboarder Meets Whale Tail | Crazy Days Mean Quick Loans


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 24 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >

















RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1



Relevant Links

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

Ultimate Politics

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat



Colorado Pols is wholly owned by www.ColoradoPols.com, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com
Powered by: SoapBlox