CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 23, 2009 07:42 PM UTC

Contract for Colorado: Right Politics, No Answers

  • 3 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The Denver Post reports on the Republican unveiling of the “Contract for Colorado”:

The agenda out today – dubbed the Contract for Colorado – includes such promises as limiting state spending and requiring employers to verify new hires’ immigration status.

The plan specifically vows to undo a number of Ritter’s policies, including an executive order that allows state employees to unionize and a recent increase in vehicle-registration fees.

Ritter defended his record, touting improvements to renewable-energy efforts, education and the state’s business climate.

The platform’s focus is largely on fiscal issues, though it also outlines reinstating a ban on state funding for health providers that support abortion rights, such as Planned Parenthood.

The platform was forged during two weeks’ worth of meetings among top Republicans, who also included former Gov. Bill Owens, state legislative leaders and state GOP chairman Dick Wadhams. It is planned to be a ticketwide agenda that lends its message to dozens of Republican candidates at all levels, Penry said.

Politically speaking, the “Contract for Colorado” is a good move for Republicans who have left voters wondering for years just what it is that they stand for. But on the other hand, the “Contract” is really just the same old Republican talking points that haven’t changed in years. There’s new packaging, but not much else. For example, the standard talking points of limiting spending and reducing taxes sounds great, but it isn’t going to actually fix Colorado’s massive budget problem.

Comments

3 thoughts on “Contract for Colorado: Right Politics, No Answers

  1. The Denver Post needs to really challenge these guys on specifics. It is easy to stand up and shout, “Limit State Spending!”. It is much harder, however, to specifically say what to cut.

    Do they support making CU and CSU private institutions? Will they cut ALL higher ed funding?

    They do say they want to repeal FASTER, so how will they fund transportation? Will we sell state highways to private investors who can charge tolls?

    Constitutionally, they can’t cut K-12 or Parks and Recreation.

    Will they close down more state mental health institutions?

    They support private prisons, but those aren’t free. We still have to pay for them and then be beholden to those companies.

    There are so many questions that are not being asked of the Republicans. Questions that state Democrats have to answer every year when they do the budget.

     

  2. • A commitment to limit taxes and state spending. (MORE CUTS)

    • Rescinding the Ritter executive order unionizing state employees. (TO RETURN PUBLIC EMPLOYEES TO 2ND CLASS CITIZENS LIKE ALL PRIVATE EMPLOYEES CAN)

    • Requiring employers to participate in the federal e-verify program for new hires. (TANCREDO)

    • Establishment of a state “rainy day” fund. (MORE CUTS TO BUILD A RAINY DAY FUND IN THE MISDST OF A RECESSION?? WTF??)

    • Responsible development of renewable energy and Colorado’s abundant oil and natural gas resources as well as nuclear energy. (RESPONSIBLE DOES NOT PRECEDE OIL, NATURAL GAS OR NUCLEAR)

    • Appointing conservative judges to balance the court and reign in judicial activism. (SO THEY CAN MAKE SURE THEY WIN ALL OF THEIR CASES)

    • Expanding school choice through additional charter schools and education vouchers. (ANTI-PUBLIC EDUCATION)

    • Reversing property tax and auto registration taxes. (MORE CUTS)

  3. what a list of issues for the Republicans.  The Democrats are in deep, deep trouble.  If I had some work, I might actually care about any of them.  I think some of our Republican hopefuls should visit New Jersey.  Their property taxes are at least 10 times ours – now that’s a problem!  In fact, my understanding is that is a big reason why Christie won there.

    I would suggest an interesting contract could include:  oversight and accountability for state government, particularly in regards to CDOT; elimination of the 35 acre limit on planning regulations; assuring the continuing funding of public education.  There are more.

    Maybe the Republicans should look at a state VAT to shore up the state’s revenues.  Call it a tax break because we would eliminate the state sales tax.  Of course, to be effective it would also eliminate any tax loopholes or exclusions.  Maybe it could even be linked with the personal property tax (or whatever it is, I admit I’ve never really understood that one).

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

122 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!